Mailing List Archive: SPF: Devel

jSPF-0.9b3 was released

by nm at byteaction | Sep 24, 2006, 3:08 AM | 0 replies →

nm at byteaction

0

Sep 24, 2006, 3:08 AM →

repeated all mechanism

by stuart at bmsi | Sep 19, 2006, 11:28 AM | 8 replies →

stuart at bmsi

8

Sep 21, 2006, 6:09 PM →

Interesting permerror

by stuart at bmsi | Sep 19, 2006, 1:43 PM | 2 replies →

stuart at bmsi

2

Sep 19, 2006, 4:01 PM →

Issue tracker for 4408bis

by wayne at schlitt | Sep 19, 2006, 7:49 AM | 5 replies →

wayne at schlitt

5

Sep 19, 2006, 3:25 PM →

Design bugs in v=spf1 (was: Issue tracker for 4408bis)

by julian at mehnle | Sep 19, 2006, 1:15 PM | 1 replies →

julian at mehnle

1

Sep 19, 2006, 1:50 PM →

Revised mx-limit and ptr-limit tests

by stuart at bmsi | Sep 19, 2006, 11:41 AM | 0 replies →

stuart at bmsi

0

Sep 19, 2006, 11:41 AM →

Re: "-all." trailing point error?

by nobody at xyzzy | Sep 19, 2006, 4:23 AM | 1 replies →

nobody at xyzzy

1

Sep 19, 2006, 10:45 AM →

Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC

by stuart at bmsi | Sep 18, 2006, 8:11 AM | 24 replies →

stuart at bmsi

24

Sep 19, 2006, 10:31 AM →

Issue tracker (was: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC)

by nobody at xyzzy | Sep 19, 2006, 7:41 AM | 0 replies →

nobody at xyzzy

0

Sep 19, 2006, 7:41 AM →

Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC

by nobody at xyzzy | Sep 19, 2006, 7:17 AM | 0 replies →

nobody at xyzzy

0

Sep 19, 2006, 7:17 AM →

Re: Re: Disagreement over meaning of mx-limit in RFC

by scott at kitterman | Sep 19, 2006, 6:31 AM | 0 replies →

scott at kitterman

0

Sep 19, 2006, 6:31 AM →

ip6 mech with ip4 connection

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 31, 2006, 12:17 PM | 23 replies →

stuart at bmsi

23

Sep 18, 2006, 3:41 PM →

test-suite

by stuart at bmsi | Sep 1, 2006, 3:27 PM | 0 replies →

stuart at bmsi

0

Sep 1, 2006, 3:27 PM →

dual-cidr

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 29, 2006, 4:24 PM | 7 replies →

stuart at bmsi

7

Aug 31, 2006, 9:01 AM →

test-suite: mx-limit

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 30, 2006, 6:00 PM | 3 replies →

stuart at bmsi

3

Aug 31, 2006, 12:02 AM →

More test-suite committed

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 30, 2006, 12:09 PM | 0 replies →

stuart at bmsi

0

Aug 30, 2006, 12:09 PM →

One more "C" YAML implementation (was: SPF testcase formats)

by julian at mehnle | Aug 30, 2006, 12:08 PM | 0 replies →

julian at mehnle

0

Aug 30, 2006, 12:08 PM →

Re: spam.co.nz

by julian at mehnle | Aug 30, 2006, 11:42 AM | 0 replies →

julian at mehnle

0

Aug 30, 2006, 11:42 AM →

Default explanation in test suite

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 28, 2006, 10:32 AM | 2 replies →

stuart at bmsi

2

Aug 29, 2006, 8:51 PM →

XML Version of YML Test Scripts?

by monte.hansen at stashsoft | Aug 29, 2006, 7:56 AM | 0 replies →

monte.hansen at stashsoft

0

Aug 29, 2006, 7:56 AM →

Pseudo Public SPF Test Pages

by monte.hansen at stashsoft | Aug 23, 2006, 6:54 PM | 15 replies →

monte.hansen at stashsoft

15

Aug 29, 2006, 7:47 AM →

Re: Which SPF implementation to choose?

by julian at mehnle | Aug 28, 2006, 3:39 PM | 0 replies →

julian at mehnle

0

Aug 28, 2006, 3:39 PM →

test-suite changes

by stuart at bmsi | Aug 28, 2006, 11:06 AM | 0 replies →

stuart at bmsi

0

Aug 28, 2006, 11:06 AM →

SPF Glyphs

by monte.hansen at stashsoft | Aug 23, 2006, 7:02 PM | 2 replies →

monte.hansen at stashsoft

2

Aug 24, 2006, 9:21 AM →

Mail::SPF::Query null sender in header comment

by jam at jamux | Aug 24, 2006, 6:12 AM | 3 replies →

jam at jamux

3

Aug 24, 2006, 8:33 AM →