Julian Mehnle wrote:
> I think we should set up an issue tracker for the
> specification ASAP so we don't make the same problems in
> 4408bis or SPFv3. Comments?
+1
First submission: "Danish". Apparently an erratum sent
to the Rfc editor didn't make it into the pending errata.
Frank
P.S.: What about your (old) question wrt the SID IP, are
we interested to submit it again, in light of the new MS
activities with MS patents ? Or is their claim expired ?
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com
> I think we should set up an issue tracker for the
> specification ASAP so we don't make the same problems in
> 4408bis or SPFv3. Comments?
+1
First submission: "Danish". Apparently an erratum sent
to the Rfc editor didn't make it into the pending errata.
Frank
P.S.: What about your (old) question wrt the SID IP, are
we interested to submit it again, in light of the new MS
activities with MS patents ? Or is their claim expired ?
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com