Mailing List Archive

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John A. Martin wrote:
> Would it be good to let the Mail::SPF::Query header comment reflect
> the HELO parameter when the mailfrom is <>?
>
> For example, libmail-spf-query-perl-1.999.1-2 gives:
>
> ,----
> | header_comment=example.com: domain of designates 80.91.229.2 as
> | permitted sender
> `----

I wouldn't hold my breath for fixes to Mail::SPF::Query. At least I,
personally, don't plan on wasting my time on working any further on it.
Instead, I am working on its successor, Mail::SPF, which should be done
within very few weeks now. Mail::SPF is going to be several orders of
magnitude more clean and maintainable than M:S:Q.

If someone else wants to keep working on M:S:Q, they can be given write
access to the Subversion repository. I could then push any releases to
CPAN (and perhaps Debian).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7ax1wL7PKlBZWjsRAui9AJ4iLBBSKw7/gw9fwmjRDLl/4NbtAQCgnSpX
mBAxs4LXPALMQ9koVA/0jF4=
=EgNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com

>>>>> "Julian" == Julian Mehnle
>>>>> "Re: Mail::SPF::Query null sender in header comment"
>>>>> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:41:08 +0000

Julian> I wouldn't hold my breath for fixes to Mail::SPF::Query.
Julian> At least I, personally, don't plan on wasting my time on
Julian> working any further on it. Instead, I am working on its
Julian> successor, Mail::SPF, which should be done within very few
Julian> weeks now. Mail::SPF is going to be several orders of
Julian> magnitude more clean and maintainable than M:S:Q.

Will Mail::SPF maybe be the first to pass the formal test suite? :))

jam

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John A. Martin wrote:
> Will Mail::SPF maybe be the first to pass the formal test suite? :))

No. I think pySPF already passes it (or at least those parts of the test
suite that already exist).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7cbYwL7PKlBZWjsRAtJhAKDRx8eW8+MO6lBkovqZ6NqzVQtjvwCfR0R0
e70w7B58HevbPTY8Ayk3GZQ=
=wovo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com