Mailing List Archive: SpamAssassin: users

Re: Linking ClamAV into procmail?

by mailings02 at ttlexceeded | Feb 9, 2004, 4:08 PM | 16 replies →

mailings02 at ttlexceeded

16

Feb 13, 2004, 1:56 PM →

Hardware and software setup questions

by frankd at iaw | Feb 13, 2004, 6:10 AM | 8 replies →

frankd at iaw

8

Feb 13, 2004, 12:26 PM →

Razor working?

by lists at pmbx | Feb 10, 2004, 6:16 PM | 10 replies →

lists at pmbx

10

Feb 13, 2004, 12:01 PM →

RulesDuJout: What happenened to www.emtinc.org

by ont at uni-c | Feb 11, 2004, 3:23 AM | 3 replies →

ont at uni-c

3

Feb 13, 2004, 11:09 AM →

I'm getting tired of these...

by frankj at osc | Feb 13, 2004, 2:12 AM | 5 replies →

frankj at osc

5

Feb 13, 2004, 11:06 AM →

Question about restarting spam assassin

by BHaase at good-sam | Feb 13, 2004, 7:48 AM | 3 replies →

BHaase at good-sam

3

Feb 13, 2004, 10:56 AM →

[OT] What's your favorite linux distro for SA?

by spamassassin at freddyt | Feb 9, 2004, 11:03 AM | 28 replies →

spamassassin at freddyt

28

Feb 13, 2004, 9:23 AM →

Jennifer's rules.. A new location yet??

by rleonard at opto22 | Feb 13, 2004, 8:57 AM | 1 replies →

rleonard at opto22

1

Feb 13, 2004, 9:13 AM →

Spam without content (re-send)

by werner_schalk at gmx | Feb 13, 2004, 5:12 AM | 2 replies →

werner_schalk at gmx

2

Feb 13, 2004, 5:24 AM →

Re: {Spam?} RE: I'm getting tired of these...

by martinh at solid-state-logic | Feb 13, 2004, 4:59 AM | 0 replies →

martinh at solid-state-logic

0

Feb 13, 2004, 4:59 AM →

problem with sa-learn/perl5.8.3

by sroe0099 at rz | Feb 13, 2004, 4:08 AM | 1 replies →

sroe0099 at rz

1

Feb 13, 2004, 4:35 AM →

ISO subject line

by btarver at fpwk | Feb 11, 2004, 5:39 PM | 7 replies →

btarver at fpwk

7

Feb 13, 2004, 4:17 AM →

I dont know if I should be upset about this spam or not???

by keith at rogersmfg | Feb 12, 2004, 3:24 PM | 5 replies →

keith at rogersmfg

5

Feb 12, 2004, 11:51 PM →

Re: [Comment] Re: [cpan #5313] Cannot use ? : in meta tests

by felicity at kluge | Feb 12, 2004, 10:53 PM | 0 replies →

felicity at kluge

0

Feb 12, 2004, 10:53 PM →

MyDoom E-mail

by demi at intellipro | Feb 9, 2004, 12:57 PM | 31 replies →

demi at intellipro

31

Feb 12, 2004, 6:10 PM →

domain for bigevil

by lindsay at pa | Feb 6, 2004, 10:23 AM | 4 replies →

lindsay at pa

4

Feb 12, 2004, 5:06 PM →

Blocking large IP ranges, was Re: I dont know if I should be upset about this spam or not???

by wstearns at pobox | Feb 12, 2004, 4:32 PM | 0 replies →

wstearns at pobox

0

Feb 12, 2004, 4:32 PM →

If you want to be upset about spam try this

by gcirino at cirelle | Feb 12, 2004, 3:43 PM | 0 replies →

gcirino at cirelle

0

Feb 12, 2004, 3:43 PM →

use access.db or sa-mimedefang.cf?

by dana.work at navarrocollege | Feb 12, 2004, 9:16 AM | 2 replies →

dana.work at navarrocollege

2

Feb 12, 2004, 3:33 PM →

DOS potential?

by spamassassin at vlminternational | Feb 12, 2004, 11:25 AM | 5 replies →

spamassassin at vlminternational

5

Feb 12, 2004, 1:17 PM →

Question Regarding Whitelists

by jason at sheffieldave | Feb 12, 2004, 12:56 PM | 1 replies →

jason at sheffieldave

1

Feb 12, 2004, 1:14 PM →

Bad Bayes! No Cookie!

by alerts at nu-designs | Feb 12, 2004, 11:02 AM | 1 replies →

alerts at nu-designs

1

Feb 12, 2004, 12:15 PM →

RE: BLOCK: even more useless spam stats

by csanterre at MerchantsOverseas | Feb 12, 2004, 10:17 AM | 1 replies →

csanterre at MerchantsOverseas

1

Feb 12, 2004, 11:34 AM →

USER_IN_BLACKLIST / AWL - what controls these scores?

by alerts at nu-designs | Feb 11, 2004, 4:45 PM | 2 replies →

alerts at nu-designs

2

Feb 12, 2004, 10:57 AM →

SA Problem: spam with random words to defeat Baysian filtering ...

by rob at ControlQ | Feb 11, 2004, 9:05 AM | 22 replies →

rob at ControlQ

22

Feb 12, 2004, 10:37 AM →