Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 21:33:53 schrieb Duncan:
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 as excerpted:
> > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:38 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the
> >> > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do
> >> > not like how long portage is taking now for dep calculations.
> >>
> >> And, cannot that efforts be put in enhancing portage instead?
> >
> > To make you see the problems and decisions, I'm going to elaborate a
> > little and would like you to ask yourself some questions.
> >
> > Is it possible to reasonable enhance the Portage code to improve dep
> > calculations in a reasonable amount of time?
>
> TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^)
>
Some more RAM too.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
> Tom Wijsman posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 as excerpted:
> > On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:21:38 +0200 Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribió:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> > Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the
> >> > intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do
> >> > not like how long portage is taking now for dep calculations.
> >>
> >> And, cannot that efforts be put in enhancing portage instead?
> >
> > To make you see the problems and decisions, I'm going to elaborate a
> > little and would like you to ask yourself some questions.
> >
> > Is it possible to reasonable enhance the Portage code to improve dep
> > calculations in a reasonable amount of time?
>
> TL;DR: SSDs help. =:^)
>
Some more RAM too.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/