Mailing List Archive

-1 (committer)

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:14 PM Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
wrote:

>
> : Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> : make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> : committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> : worked out during the process if the decision passes.
> :
> : Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
> :
> : [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> : [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> -1
>
> (non-binding)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.

+1 (pmc)

We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
"code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.

Thanks,
Shawn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
result of this proposal.

On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> > independent entities.
>
> +1 (pmc)
>
> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with
no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort
of how a sub project becomes a TLP.

On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
> result of this proposal.
>
> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>> > independent entities.
>>
>> +1 (pmc)
>>
>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> --
Regards,

Atri
Apache Concerted

This is a procedural vote. Code is not affected. The future of each
project diverges from the same git commit.

Dawid

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:08 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
<ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as result of this proposal.
>
> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>> > independent entities.
>>
>> +1 (pmc)
>>
>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

I am about to re-read the rules here but I think this is a procedural vote.

Also, considering almost all procedural changes would impact the code in
some way, I don't think anything would pass if we were to put stuff in the
"code modification" category as getting a single veto would stop all
progress.

-Anshum

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:17 PM Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:

> I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with
> no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort
> of how a sub project becomes a TLP.
>
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
>> result of this proposal.
>>
>> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>> > independent entities.
>>>
>>> +1 (pmc)
>>>
>>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
>>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
>>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted
>


--
Anshum Gupta

Dawid,

Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).


I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
committers.

Also, community votes are as important as it would help a lot of people
also decide what is the right direction to move forward w.r.t. the
community.

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:37 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.
>
> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>
> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>
> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>
> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>
> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote.
>
> Dawid
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

--
Anshum Gupta

I agree this is not a code change category vote. It’s a majority vote. -1s are not vetos.

Simon

> On 12. May 2020, at 21:17, Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:
>
> ?
> I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort of how a sub project becomes a TLP.
>
>> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as result of this proposal.
>>
>>> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>> > independent entities.
>>>
>>> +1 (pmc)
>>>
>>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
>>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
>>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted

I agree this is a procedural vote. Here's my +1 for the proposal.

Shai

On Tue, May 12, 2020, 23:07 Simon Willnauer <simon.willnauer@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree this is not a code change category vote. It’s a majority vote. -1s
> are not vetos.
>
> Simon
>
> On 12. May 2020, at 21:17, Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:
>
> ?
> I would argue against that — this is more of a project level decision with
> no changes to the core code base per se — more of restructuring of it. Sort
> of how a sub project becomes a TLP.
>
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:38, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is in the code modification category, since code will be modified as
>> result of this proposal.
>>
>> On Wed, 13 May, 2020, 12:27 am Shawn Heisey, <apache@elyograg.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/12/2020 1:36 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>> > independent entities.
>>>
>>> +1 (pmc)
>>>
>>> We should clarify exactly what kind of vote this is. If it is in the
>>> "code modification" category, then a single -1 vote would be enough to
>>> defeat the proposal. There are already some -1 votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>> --
> Regards,
>
> Atri
> Apache Concerted
>
>

+1

Koji

On 2020/05/12 16:36, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.
>
> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>
> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>
> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>
> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>
> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote.
>
> Dawid
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

+1 (binding)

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:18 PM Koji Sekiguchi <koji.sekiguchi@rondhuit.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Koji
>
> On 2020/05/12 16:36, Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> > independent entities.
> >
> > To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> > like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> > years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> > exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> > patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> > development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
> >
> > We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> > chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> > discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> > matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> > against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> > don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> > we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> > firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> > it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> > future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
> >
> > Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> > make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> > committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> > worked out during the process if the decision passes.
> >
> > Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
> >
> > [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> > [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
> >
> > Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> > express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> > votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
> >
> > The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> > and cast a vote.
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

+1

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:37 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.
>
> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>
> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>
> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>
> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>
> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote.
>
> Dawid
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

--
Adrien

> I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not committers.

I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
CI infra, contribution procedure, release cycles, etc.
If this proposal is the best way to do so, +1 (non binding).

Tomoko


2020?5?13?(?) 16:21 Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>:

> > I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
> committers.
>
> I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
> but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.
>
> Dawid
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-1 (binding)


Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/


On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:39 AM Tomoko Uchida <tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
> though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
> CI infra, contribution procedure, release cycles, etc.
> If this proposal is the best way to do so, +1 (non binding).
>
> Tomoko
>
>
> 2020?5?13?(?) 16:21 Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>:
>
>> > I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
>> committers.
>>
>> I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
>> but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

-1 (binding)

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joel Bernstein <joelsolr@gmail.com> wrote:

> -1 (binding)
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:39 AM Tomoko Uchida <
> tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
>> though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
>> CI infra, contribution procedure, release cycles, etc.
>> If this proposal is the best way to do so, +1 (non binding).
>>
>> Tomoko
>>
>>
>> 2020?5?13?(?) 16:21 Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> > I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
>>> committers.
>>>
>>> I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
>>> but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.
>>>
>>> Dawid
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

(having not read all replies, just the message I added binding... later
replies indicate that i should have said

-1 (committer)

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:53 AM Gus Heck <gus.heck@gmail.com> wrote:

> -1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:53 AM Joel Bernstein <joelsolr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:39 AM Tomoko Uchida <
>> tomoko.uchida.1111@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Personally, I am not particularly interested in "promoting" Solr to TLP
>>> though, agree with the idea Lucene and Solr should have separate code base,
>>> CI infra, contribution procedure, release cycles, etc.
>>> If this proposal is the best way to do so, +1 (non binding).
>>>
>>> Tomoko
>>>
>>>
>>> 2020?5?13?(?) 16:21 Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> > I wanted to clarify that only PMC members cast binding votes and not
>>>> committers.
>>>>
>>>> I thought it's up to the decision of the one who sends the vote thread
>>>> but I stand corrected, thank you Anshum.
>>>>
>>>> Dawid
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>


--
http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
http://www.the111shift.com (play)

+1

On 2020/05/12 07:36:57, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.
>
> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>
> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>
> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>
> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>
> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote.
>
> Dawid
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

++1

Regards,
Lucky Sharma

On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 8:01 PM, Mark Harwood <mharwood@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2020/05/12 07:36:57, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
> >
> > According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> > calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> > project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> > independent entities.
> >
> > To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> > like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> > years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> > exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> > patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> > development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
> >
> > We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> > chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> > discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> > matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> > against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> > don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> > we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> > firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> > it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> > future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
> >
> > Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> > make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> > committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> > worked out during the process if the decision passes.
> >
> > Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
> >
> > [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> > [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
> >
> > Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> > express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> > votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
> >
> > The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> > and cast a vote.
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Warm Regards,

Lucky Sharma
Contact No :+91 9821559918

+1 (binding)

Tommaso

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
> independent entities.
>
> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>
> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>
> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>
> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>
> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>
> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>
> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
> and cast a vote.
>
> Dawid
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

+1

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Tommaso
>
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>
>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>> independent entities.
>>
>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>
>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>
>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>
>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>
>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>
>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>
>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>> and cast a vote.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>> [2]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

+1 (binding)

Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
nknize@apache.org


On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0828@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <
> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Tommaso
>>
>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>>
>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>> independent entities.
>>>
>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>>
>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>>
>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>>
>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>>
>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>>
>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>>> and cast a vote.
>>>
>>> Dawid
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>

+1 (binding)

Kevin Risden



On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize <nknize@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
> nknize@apache.org
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0828@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <
>> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Tommaso
>>>
>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>>>
>>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>>> independent entities.
>>>>
>>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>>>
>>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>>>
>>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>>>
>>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>>>> and cast a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Dawid
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>

+1

On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden <krisden@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize <nknize@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
>> nknize@apache.org
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0828@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <
>>> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Tommaso
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>>>>
>>>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>>>> independent entities.
>>>>>
>>>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>>>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>>>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>>>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>>>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>>>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>>>>
>>>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>>>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>>>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>>>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>>>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>>>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>>>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>>>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>>>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>>>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>>>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>>>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>>>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>>>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>>>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>>>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>>>>> and cast a vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>

+1

On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 19:20, Gora Mohanty <gora@mimirtech.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 22:42, Kevin Risden <krisden@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Kevin Risden
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize <nknize@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
>>> Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch
>>> Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
>>> nknize@apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0828@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili <
>>>> tommaso.teofili@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Tommaso
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am
>>>>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache
>>>>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two
>>>>>> independent entities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems
>>>>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10
>>>>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and
>>>>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers,
>>>>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make
>>>>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a
>>>>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The
>>>>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the
>>>>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are
>>>>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I
>>>>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible --
>>>>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I
>>>>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put
>>>>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the
>>>>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and
>>>>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC,
>>>>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be
>>>>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal
>>>>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to
>>>>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding
>>>>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read
>>>>>> and cast a vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dawid
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>

--
Met vriendelijke groet,

Martijn van Groningen