Mailing List Archive: Archetype Storage

Hello List,

I looked at the SQLStorage package that is part of Archtypes, but found out that Archetypes objects stored through SQLStorage still have a presence in the ZODB, which means it's not a solution if you totally want to get rid of Data.fs bloat. (It is also the policy and requirement in our company to have everything in outsourced in the MySQLDB and I can't change this)

I am looking for a way of using the Archetype Content Object only as the View (presentation layer) for easy rendering of the forms and mapping them directly to a relational database without any interference of the ZODB.

Is it possible to modify an Archetype that it looks up the content items completly in the relational database and not first in the zope DB (that maps to the rel. database like in SQLStorage)?
I don't see a reason why one should store the same object 2 times in the ZODB and MySQL.

Any help and hint will be appreciated, Thank you very much!

Regards, Dennis
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
_______________________________________________
Zope-DB mailing list
Zope-DB@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db

Dennis Schulz-2 wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> I looked at the SQLStorage package that is part of Archtypes, but found
> out that Archetypes objects stored through SQLStorage still have a
> presence in the ZODB, which means it's not a solution if you totally want
> to get rid of Data.fs bloat. (It is also the policy and requirement in our
> company to have everything in outsourced in the MySQLDB and I can't change
> this)
>
> I am looking for a way of using the Archetype Content Object only as the
> View (presentation layer) for easy rendering of the forms and mapping them
> directly to a relational database without any interference of the ZODB.
>
> Is it possible to modify an Archetype that it looks up the content items
> completly in the relational database and not first in the zope DB (that
> maps to the rel. database like in SQLStorage)?
> I don't see a reason why one should store the same object 2 times in the
> ZODB and MySQL.
>
> Any help and hint will be appreciated, Thank you very much!
>

You're on the wrong list and this is the third list you try, so please have
some patience and get answers on archetypes-general, which is the right
list.

Martin
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Archetype-Storage-tf2417503.html#a6739316
Sent from the Zope - DB mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Zope-DB mailing list
Zope-DB@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db