Mailing List Archive

SMP support?
I'm not finding much on the 'net; just wondering how good the SMP support
in -unstable (or is it in -testing too?) is.

I'm picking up a few dual-processor machines, and would love to be able to
take advantage of SMP for a few of my guests.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
RE: SMP support? [ In reply to ]
> I'm not finding much on the 'net; just wondering how good the
> SMP support in -unstable (or is it in -testing too?) is.
>
> I'm picking up a few dual-processor machines, and would love
> to be able to take advantage of SMP for a few of my guests.

Believed stable, but not optimised.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
RE: SMP support? [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Ian Pratt wrote:
> Believed stable, but not optimised.

Does not optimised mean that it'll be slower than running UP, or is there
still a performance gain to be had with it?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com |
| depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users