Mailing List Archive

[XEN PATCH 01/10] x86/cpufeature: add parentheses to comply with Rule 20.7
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>
---
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatureset.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatureset.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatureset.h
index f179229f192f..a9c51bc514a8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatureset.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatureset.h
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@

#include <xen/stringify.h>

-#define XEN_CPUFEATURE(name, value) X86_FEATURE_##name = value,
+#define XEN_CPUFEATURE(name, value) X86_FEATURE_##name = (value),
enum {
#include <public/arch-x86/cpufeatureset.h>
#include <asm/cpufeatures.h>
--
2.34.1
Re: [XEN PATCH 01/10] x86/cpufeature: add parentheses to comply with Rule 20.7 [ In reply to ]
On 18.03.2024 12:53, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
> of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
> macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
> current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
> can possibly alter the semantics of the passed-in macro parameter.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>

Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>