Mailing List Archive

[Xen-merge] merging the xen-merge work ?
I'm wondering where we should merge the xen-merge work first:
into the xenolinux tree for 2.6.13, or into the upstream kernel?

At any rate, it would be nice to finally get rid of the sparse
trees - those are a pain to merge up to newer kernel snapshots ;)

--
All Rights Reversed

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
Re: [Xen-merge] merging the xen-merge work ? [ In reply to ]
* Rik van Riel (riel@redhat.com) wrote:
> I'm wondering where we should merge the xen-merge work first:
> into the xenolinux tree for 2.6.13, or into the upstream kernel?

As soon as Linus gets back we'll trickle in the first of the outstanding
bits upstream. Those could become a patch in patches/ (useful for doing
subarch switch), or the analogous patch could go into xen (until there's
no diff between arch/xen/i386 and arch/i386, then try and switch).

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge