Mailing List Archive

I wholeheartedly support nominating Mate to be a committer on xen-api.
I have had the pleasure of working with him for more than a year, mainly
around integrating XenServer and OpenStack. I think we will be very
lucky to have him as a committer.

Thanks,
Euan

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Mate Lakat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
>
> https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
>
> My goals are:
> - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
> - Accelerate the development of SM
>
> To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
> the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
>
> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
>
> This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
> an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please re-do
> this nomination?
>
> Thanks,
> Mate Lakat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org]
> On Behalf Of Euan Harris
> Sent: 05 August 2014 4:03 PM
> To: Mate Lakat
> Cc: Xen API mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer
>
> I wholeheartedly support nominating Mate to be a committer on xen-api.
> I have had the pleasure of working with him for more than a year, mainly
> around integrating XenServer and OpenStack. I think we will be very
> lucky to have him as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Euan
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Mate Lakat wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
> >
> > https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
> >
> > My goals are:
> > - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
> > - Accelerate the development of SM
> >
> > To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
> > the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
> >
> > http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
> >
> > This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
> > an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please
> > re-do this nomination?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mate Lakat
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-api mailing list
> > Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org] On
> Behalf Of Rob Hoes
> Sent: Wednesday 06 August 2014 13:40
> To: Euan Harris; Mate Lakat
> Cc: Xen API mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer
>
> +1
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org]
> > On Behalf Of Euan Harris
> > Sent: 05 August 2014 4:03 PM
> > To: Mate Lakat
> > Cc: Xen API mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer
> >
> > I wholeheartedly support nominating Mate to be a committer on xen-api.
> > I have had the pleasure of working with him for more than a year, mainly
> > around integrating XenServer and OpenStack. I think we will be very
> > lucky to have him as a committer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Euan
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Mate Lakat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
> > >
> > > My goals are:
> > > - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
> > > - Accelerate the development of SM
> > >
> > > To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
> > > the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
> > >
> > > http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
> > >
> > > This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
> > > an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please
> > > re-do this nomination?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mate Lakat
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-api mailing list
> > > Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> > > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-api mailing list
> > Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> > http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

+1

On 13 Aug 2014, at 13:51, Simon Beaumont <simon.beaumont@citrix.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org] On
>> Behalf Of Rob Hoes
>> Sent: Wednesday 06 August 2014 13:40
>> To: Euan Harris; Mate Lakat
>> Cc: Xen API mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Euan Harris
>>> Sent: 05 August 2014 4:03 PM
>>> To: Mate Lakat
>>> Cc: Xen API mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer
>>>
>>> I wholeheartedly support nominating Mate to be a committer on xen-api.
>>> I have had the pleasure of working with him for more than a year, mainly
>>> around integrating XenServer and OpenStack. I think we will be very
>>> lucky to have him as a committer.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Euan
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Mate Lakat wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
>>>>
>>>> My goals are:
>>>> - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
>>>> - Accelerate the development of SM
>>>>
>>>> To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
>>>> the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
>>>>
>>>> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
>>>>
>>>> This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
>>>> an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please
>>>> re-do this nomination?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mate Lakat
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-api mailing list
>>>> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
>>>> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-api mailing list
>>> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
>>> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-api mailing list
>> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

+1

On 05/08/14 16:03, Euan Harris wrote:
> I wholeheartedly support nominating Mate to be a committer on xen-api.
> I have had the pleasure of working with him for more than a year, mainly
> around integrating XenServer and OpenStack. I think we will be very
> lucky to have him as a committer.
>
> Thanks,
> Euan
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Mate Lakat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
>>
>> https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
>>
>> My goals are:
>> - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
>> - Accelerate the development of SM
>>
>> To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
>> the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
>>
>> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
>>
>> This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
>> an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please re-do
>> this nomination?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mate Lakat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-api mailing list
>> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Hi all,

it appears that we have 5 votes in favour as per http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer#query:Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer%20list%3Acom.xensource.lists.xen-api+page:1+mid:dsb4kgqir2qxfcvf+state:results

So the vote carries and mate is a committer

Regards
Lars

On 5 Aug 2014, at 15:32, Mate Lakat <mate.lakat@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
>
> https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
>
> My goals are:
> - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
> - Accelerate the development of SM
>
> To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
> the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
>
> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
>
> This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
> an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please re-do
> this nomination?
>
> Thanks,
> Mate Lakat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Congratulations, Mate! I hope your election will usher in a new era of
increased focus on testing :-)

Jon

On 27/08/14 15:44, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it appears that we have 5 votes in favour as
> per http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer#query:Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer%20list%3Acom.xensource.lists.xen-api+page:1+mid:dsb4kgqir2qxfcvf+state:results
> <http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer#query:Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer%20list:com.xensource.lists.xen-api+page:1+mid:dsb4kgqir2qxfcvf+state:results>
>
> So the vote carries and mate is a committer
>
> Regards
> Lars
>
> On 5 Aug 2014, at 15:32, Mate Lakat <mate.lakat@citrix.com
> <mailto:mate.lakat@citrix.com>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:
>>
>> https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit
>>
>> My goals are:
>> - Add more unit testing to the storage manager
>> - Accelerate the development of SM
>>
>> To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
>> the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to
>>
>> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html
>>
>> This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
>> an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please re-do
>> this nomination?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mate Lakat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-api mailing list
>> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
>> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Hi all,

First of all, thank you for the votes and the support. I hope we'll be able to increase the visibility on the unit testing side. At the moment my focus in on the storage manager, but I'm hoping that we will be able to cover other projects as well.

Cheers,
Mate


From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jon Ludlam
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:12 PM
To: xen-api@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Nominate Mate Lakat as a Committer

Congratulations, Mate! I hope your election will usher in a new era of increased focus on testing :-)

Jon

On 27/08/14 15:44, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi all,

it appears that we have 5 votes in favour as per http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer#query:Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer%20list%3Acom.xensource.lists.xen-api+page:1+mid:dsb4kgqir2qxfcvf+state:results<http://xen.markmail.org/search/?q=Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer#query:Nominate%20Mate%20Lakat%20as%20a%20Committer%20list:com.xensource.lists.xen-api+page:1+mid:dsb4kgqir2qxfcvf+state:results>

So the vote carries and mate is a committer

Regards
Lars

On 5 Aug 2014, at 15:32, Mate Lakat <mate.lakat@citrix.com<mailto:mate.lakat@citrix.com>> wrote:


Hi,

I am actively working on the storage component (sm) of xen-api:

https://github.com/xapi-project/sm/commits/xs64bit

My goals are:
- Add more unit testing to the storage manager
- Accelerate the development of SM

To achieve these goals, I would like to ask for a committer status on
the xen-api project. As far as I understand, according to

http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html

This nomination should have came from a committer, not from myself. If
an existing committer finds value in my work, could he/she please re-do
this nomination?

Thanks,
Mate Lakat

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org<mailto:Xen-api@lists.xen.org>
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api





_______________________________________________

Xen-api mailing list

Xen-api@lists.xen.org<mailto:Xen-api@lists.xen.org>

http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api