Kaya
I like the concept of adjusting requirements and processes to improve the
creation of Affiliates. I am concerned that by placing the opportunity on
hold while discussions take place, we know from experience that such
reviews tend to drag out a lot longer than planned.
Just stopping opportunities like this are counter productive to expanding
the community, surely there must be away for new groups to at least submit
an EOI to be recognised and get support they need as other WMF functional
opportunities like funding cycles wont wait for this part.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 23:57, Nataliia Tymkiv <ntymkiv@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share with you the outputs of the Wikimedia Foundation
> Affiliate Strategy process [1], and to invite you to give feedback on the
> proposed changes to requirements for all affiliates & to user groups
> recognition process (more below).
>
> The 2017 Strategic Direction
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017> says
> that we, the Wikimedia Movement, would build “the services and structures
> that enable others to … advance our world by collecting knowledge that
> fully represents human diversity” while carrying on “our mission of
> developing content”. As Wikimedia affiliates are a key and integral part of
> the Wikimedia movement and have knowledge and expertise to share, the
> movement’s success depends greatly on affiliates as they help people join
> us in doing mission-aligned work. The Wikimedia Foundation Affiliates
> Strategy report [2] identified a need to streamline the role of the
> Affiliations Committee (AffCom) on recognition of Wikimedia Affiliates, and
> identified issues with the current state of the process.
>
> After conversations with AffCom, the Board liaisons to AffCom identified
> two areas for improvement. These areas are about the relevant work and
> mandate of the Board related to affiliate recognition:
>
> 1) requirements for affiliates; and
>
> 2) improving the workflows around the process for the creation and
> recognition of a user group.
>
> The proposal on Meta [3] is suggesting to change the requirements for all
> existing Wikimedia affiliates, not just the legal entities. There are ten
> proposed criteria for a healthy affiliate. Examples include focusing on
> continuity by being an active group and welcoming new users, having good
> governance, and actively delivering on mission goals. Compliance with these
> requirements would be self-reported by the affiliates. The Board liaisons
> will work with the Affiliations Committee to publish a resolution outlining
> how affiliates would be expected to fulfill these requirements to remain in
> good standing.
>
> Throughout the Wikimedia Foundation Affiliate Strategy process, there was
> also feedback about user groups. Initially, user groups were meant as a
> first step toward creating chapters or thematic organizations. Over the
> years, user groups have evolved and there are now legally incorporated user
> groups, user groups with boards, etc. Getting started does need to be easy,
> but also needs to make sense, and so there is a proposal for changes to the
> current workflow. The recommendations [3] include an outline of the
> sequential steps of a revised process.
>
>
> The feedback can be given from today up till March 20, 2024 (Anywhere on
> Earth). Hopefully a fairly long feedback period will allow affiliates to
> consult with their membership, thinking it through practically.
>
> To provide your feedback, please review the page here, on Meta, [3] and
> leave comments on the talk page. Alternatively, you can join an open call (February
> 14 and 28 at 14:00 to 14:30 UTC) or request a conversation as a part of
> Talking:2024
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee/Talking:_2024>.
> You can use the Wikimedia Foundation Community Affairs Committee/Talking:
> 2024#Let’s Talk|Let’s Talk
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee/Talking:_2024#Let's_talk>
> feature to sign up for a time to speak with me and other trustees about
> this conversation or any other topic regarding the Wikimedia Foundation
> Board, Movement Strategy, and more.
>
> Note: New user group applications will be placed on hold for the duration
> of this conversation – but the ones received before will be reviewed
> according to the current process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nat & Mike & Lorenzo
> Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Liaisons to the Affiliations
> Committee
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy
>
> [2]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy:_Summary_and_Report
>
>
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy/Review
>
> Best regards,
> antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
> Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
>
> *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working
> hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You
> should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in
> advance!*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/EL3JYPNMGWDTOIGXGREUSVXHXT5SN7QB/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
--
Boodarwun
Gnangarra
'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardon nlangan Nyungar koortabodjar'
I like the concept of adjusting requirements and processes to improve the
creation of Affiliates. I am concerned that by placing the opportunity on
hold while discussions take place, we know from experience that such
reviews tend to drag out a lot longer than planned.
Just stopping opportunities like this are counter productive to expanding
the community, surely there must be away for new groups to at least submit
an EOI to be recognised and get support they need as other WMF functional
opportunities like funding cycles wont wait for this part.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 23:57, Nataliia Tymkiv <ntymkiv@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to share with you the outputs of the Wikimedia Foundation
> Affiliate Strategy process [1], and to invite you to give feedback on the
> proposed changes to requirements for all affiliates & to user groups
> recognition process (more below).
>
> The 2017 Strategic Direction
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017> says
> that we, the Wikimedia Movement, would build “the services and structures
> that enable others to … advance our world by collecting knowledge that
> fully represents human diversity” while carrying on “our mission of
> developing content”. As Wikimedia affiliates are a key and integral part of
> the Wikimedia movement and have knowledge and expertise to share, the
> movement’s success depends greatly on affiliates as they help people join
> us in doing mission-aligned work. The Wikimedia Foundation Affiliates
> Strategy report [2] identified a need to streamline the role of the
> Affiliations Committee (AffCom) on recognition of Wikimedia Affiliates, and
> identified issues with the current state of the process.
>
> After conversations with AffCom, the Board liaisons to AffCom identified
> two areas for improvement. These areas are about the relevant work and
> mandate of the Board related to affiliate recognition:
>
> 1) requirements for affiliates; and
>
> 2) improving the workflows around the process for the creation and
> recognition of a user group.
>
> The proposal on Meta [3] is suggesting to change the requirements for all
> existing Wikimedia affiliates, not just the legal entities. There are ten
> proposed criteria for a healthy affiliate. Examples include focusing on
> continuity by being an active group and welcoming new users, having good
> governance, and actively delivering on mission goals. Compliance with these
> requirements would be self-reported by the affiliates. The Board liaisons
> will work with the Affiliations Committee to publish a resolution outlining
> how affiliates would be expected to fulfill these requirements to remain in
> good standing.
>
> Throughout the Wikimedia Foundation Affiliate Strategy process, there was
> also feedback about user groups. Initially, user groups were meant as a
> first step toward creating chapters or thematic organizations. Over the
> years, user groups have evolved and there are now legally incorporated user
> groups, user groups with boards, etc. Getting started does need to be easy,
> but also needs to make sense, and so there is a proposal for changes to the
> current workflow. The recommendations [3] include an outline of the
> sequential steps of a revised process.
>
>
> The feedback can be given from today up till March 20, 2024 (Anywhere on
> Earth). Hopefully a fairly long feedback period will allow affiliates to
> consult with their membership, thinking it through practically.
>
> To provide your feedback, please review the page here, on Meta, [3] and
> leave comments on the talk page. Alternatively, you can join an open call (February
> 14 and 28 at 14:00 to 14:30 UTC) or request a conversation as a part of
> Talking:2024
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee/Talking:_2024>.
> You can use the Wikimedia Foundation Community Affairs Committee/Talking:
> 2024#Let’s Talk|Let’s Talk
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Community_Affairs_Committee/Talking:_2024#Let's_talk>
> feature to sign up for a time to speak with me and other trustees about
> this conversation or any other topic regarding the Wikimedia Foundation
> Board, Movement Strategy, and more.
>
> Note: New user group applications will be placed on hold for the duration
> of this conversation – but the ones received before will be reviewed
> according to the current process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nat & Mike & Lorenzo
> Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Liaisons to the Affiliations
> Committee
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy
>
> [2]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy:_Summary_and_Report
>
>
> [3]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Affiliates_Strategy/Review
>
> Best regards,
> antanana / Nataliia Tymkiv
> Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
>
> *NOTICE: You may have received this message outside of your normal working
> hours/days, as I usually can work more as a volunteer during weekend. You
> should not feel obligated to answer it during your days off. Thank you in
> advance!*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/EL3JYPNMGWDTOIGXGREUSVXHXT5SN7QB/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
--
Boodarwun
Gnangarra
'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardon nlangan Nyungar koortabodjar'