Mailing List Archive: licence

I would like some help about licensing and association
status. I remember that several months ago, when I
tried to draft a mission statement, and mentionned
gfdl would be the license of our content, Ec
mentionned that some of our projects were not or would
not be under gfdl. I would like more precision on the
topic, for tax deductions.
How would you describe generally the content of our
projects, in terms of reusability/freedom so we could
get tax deduction. Is there a general term/reference
which could be used, or may we cite a list of licenses
? Who could help me here ? Eclecticology, what do you
think ?

ant

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

Jim Redmond wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:11, Florence Devouard <Anthere9@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> By the way, is that completely normal that the site notice on the
>> english wikipedia is occupied by Wikimania scholarship rather than by
>> the change of licence ?
>>
>> With all due respect to Wikimania, it seems to me the impact of the
>> licence is higher than Wikimania scholarship.
>
>
> At the moment enwiki's sitenotices alternate between Wikimania scholarships
> and the license vote. IIRC it's the same story on other wikis as well.
>

Okay. I checked several times. I guess it was just bad luck :-(
Good then

ant

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l