See
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/aug/21/encyclopedia-life-species
Where's the problem with Wikispecies?
Moreover, EOL received 33.000 images from individual contributors
(http://www.flickr.com/groups/encyclopedia_of_life), Wikispecies didn't.
So, why is EOL succeeding, and Wikispecies seemingly doesn't?
Is it useful to have two overlapping projects like these?
Nemo
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2009/aug/21/encyclopedia-life-species
Where's the problem with Wikispecies?
Moreover, EOL received 33.000 images from individual contributors
(http://www.flickr.com/groups/encyclopedia_of_life), Wikispecies didn't.
So, why is EOL succeeding, and Wikispecies seemingly doesn't?
Is it useful to have two overlapping projects like these?
Nemo
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l