Mailing List Archive

varnishd dev is not as active as before?
Hello List,

Is varnishd project development still active (as before)? Some old problems
not solved for months like #53/#55 and new ones as #70. Will these be solved
after FreeBSD 6.2's release? :-))))

1.0.2 is not quite stable in relatively high load (>1000req/s).

Sorry for my bad expression, I don't want to be offensive.

--
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>
varnishd dev is not as active as before? [ In reply to ]
Hello List,

Is varnishd project development still active (as before)? Some old problems
not solved for months like #53/#55 and new ones as #70. Will these be solved
after FreeBSD 6.2's release? :-))))

1.0.2 is not quite stable in relatively high load (>1000req/s).

Sorry for my bad expression, I don't want to be offensive.

--
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>
varnishd dev is not as active as before? [ In reply to ]
Hi Jiang,

I have been trying to take a bit of vacation for the last couple
of months, and therefore I have not done much on Varnish.

I have spent a fair amount of time giving talks about Varnish,
I just came home from Stockholm yesterday, and I also read the
emails on the list, so I am not entirely out of touch.

As far as I can tell, varnish V2 development will start in
january and I do plan to get a couple of bug fixes in before that.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
varnishd dev is not as active as before? [ In reply to ]
Hi Jiang,

I have been trying to take a bit of vacation for the last couple
of months, and therefore I have not done much on Varnish.

I have spent a fair amount of time giving talks about Varnish,
I just came home from Stockholm yesterday, and I also read the
emails on the list, so I am not entirely out of touch.

As far as I can tell, varnish V2 development will start in
january and I do plan to get a couple of bug fixes in before that.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
varnishd dev is not as active as before? [ In reply to ]
Hi,

Thanks for your inspiring reply. :) The problems are so annoying
that I have to go back to Squid again.

Do you recommend varnish on 32-bit systems? I have tons of small
files (images), but 2GB should be enough form them.

> Hi Jiang,
>
> I have been trying to take a bit of vacation for the last couple
> of months, and therefore I have not done much on Varnish.
>
> I have spent a fair amount of time giving talks about Varnish,
> I just came home from Stockholm yesterday, and I also read the
> emails on the list, so I am not entirely out of touch.
>
> As far as I can tell, varnish V2 development will start in
> january and I do plan to get a couple of bug fixes in before that.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


--
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>
varnishd dev is not as active as before? [ In reply to ]
Hi,

Thanks for your inspiring reply. :) The problems are so annoying
that I have to go back to Squid again.

Do you recommend varnish on 32-bit systems? I have tons of small
files (images), but 2GB should be enough form them.

> Hi Jiang,
>
> I have been trying to take a bit of vacation for the last couple
> of months, and therefore I have not done much on Varnish.
>
> I have spent a fair amount of time giving talks about Varnish,
> I just came home from Stockholm yesterday, and I also read the
> emails on the list, so I am not entirely out of touch.
>
> As far as I can tell, varnish V2 development will start in
> january and I do plan to get a couple of bug fixes in before that.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.


--
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>