Hi,
we've seen #2117 appear about a month ago and #2106 a bit earlier. Martin and
myself now believe that #2106 may have the same root cause as #2117, fixed
(actually worked around) by #2133 - which would be a suspected regression in
Linux epoll(), maybe debian specific.
So this is a shout out to those following linux changes closely: If anyone is
aware of any known issue or discussion around epoll changes, please let us know.
Thanks, Nils
* #2117 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2117
* #2133 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/pull/2133
* #2106 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2106
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
we've seen #2117 appear about a month ago and #2106 a bit earlier. Martin and
myself now believe that #2106 may have the same root cause as #2117, fixed
(actually worked around) by #2133 - which would be a suspected regression in
Linux epoll(), maybe debian specific.
So this is a shout out to those following linux changes closely: If anyone is
aware of any known issue or discussion around epoll changes, please let us know.
Thanks, Nils
* #2117 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2117
* #2133 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/pull/2133
* #2106 https://github.com/varnishcache/varnish-cache/issues/2106
_______________________________________________
varnish-dev mailing list
varnish-dev@varnish-cache.org
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev