How does one deal with the situation where the total number of
'mechanisms' (address references) is greater than the maximum allowed
(ten), because an 'include:' domain itself refers to many addresses?
Example: I have a few a: and mx: entries in my SPF, plus I have:
include:sgizmo.com
This site has eleven SPF entries:
sgizmo.com [11]
v=spf1 a mx ip4:74.63.152.14 ip4:66.135.42.39 ip4:74.63.152.17
ip4:66.135.42.16 ip4:216.150.9.227 ip4:76.74.152.71
ip4:216.150.11.187 include:emailsrvr.com include:support.zendesk.com ~all
Basically my goose is cooked. I understand why the number of address
references has to be limited to avoid a DoS, but in order to be
useable in real-life situations, SPF has to allow for a large number
of servers.
Even if the above addresses could be consolidated with a clever mask,
I doubt I'll get very far convincing SurveyGizmo to change their SPF.
Plus, that's just one of the ESPs I deal with, there are more.
Is there a solution to this?
Pierre
Progeny Genealogy Inc.
www.progenygenealogy.com
+1 902 681-3102
"Visual analysis and presentation tools"
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1020/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1020/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
'mechanisms' (address references) is greater than the maximum allowed
(ten), because an 'include:' domain itself refers to many addresses?
Example: I have a few a: and mx: entries in my SPF, plus I have:
include:sgizmo.com
This site has eleven SPF entries:
sgizmo.com [11]
v=spf1 a mx ip4:74.63.152.14 ip4:66.135.42.39 ip4:74.63.152.17
ip4:66.135.42.16 ip4:216.150.9.227 ip4:76.74.152.71
ip4:216.150.11.187 include:emailsrvr.com include:support.zendesk.com ~all
Basically my goose is cooked. I understand why the number of address
references has to be limited to avoid a DoS, but in order to be
useable in real-life situations, SPF has to allow for a large number
of servers.
Even if the above addresses could be consolidated with a clever mask,
I doubt I'll get very far convincing SurveyGizmo to change their SPF.
Plus, that's just one of the ESPs I deal with, there are more.
Is there a solution to this?
Pierre
Progeny Genealogy Inc.
www.progenygenealogy.com
+1 902 681-3102
"Visual analysis and presentation tools"
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org [http://www.openspf.org]
Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/ [http://www.listbox.com/member/]
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/1020/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1020/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com