Mailing List Archive

Status of the _ec sub-domain issue
Hello,

Can someone please update me as to the status of the _ec sub-domain issue. Microsoft's Caller ID spec asks that the SPF TXT record be placed not in the TXT record for the actual domain, but in the _ec sub-domain.

Are people in general following the _ec sub-domain creation, or are they ignoring this?

Thanks,

Ajay Goel
ajay@silicomm.com
Silicomm Corporation

-------
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-help/current/
Donate! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-help@v2.listbox.com
RE: Status of the _ec sub-domain issue [ In reply to ]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-spf-help@v2.listbox.com
> [mailto:owner-spf-help@v2.listbox.com]On Behalf Of Ajay Goel
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 5:11 AM
> To: spf-help@v2.listbox.com
> Subject: [spf-help] Status of the _ec sub-domain issue
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Can someone please update me as to the status of the _ec
> sub-domain issue. Microsoft's Caller ID spec asks that the SPF
> TXT record be placed not in the TXT record for the actual domain,
> but in the _ec sub-domain.
>
> Are people in general following the _ec sub-domain creation, or
> are they ignoring this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ajay Goel
> ajay@silicomm.com
> Silicomm Corporation
>
People are ignoring this. Even Microsoft have moved away from it. There
are, however, documents on their web site that haven't been updated yet.

Scott Kitterman

-------
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-help/current/
Donate! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-help@v2.listbox.com