Hello,
Can someone please update me as to the status of the _ec sub-domain issue. Microsoft's Caller ID spec asks that the SPF TXT record be placed not in the TXT record for the actual domain, but in the _ec sub-domain.
Are people in general following the _ec sub-domain creation, or are they ignoring this?
Thanks,
Ajay Goel
ajay@silicomm.com
Silicomm Corporation
-------
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-help/current/
Donate! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-help@v2.listbox.com
Can someone please update me as to the status of the _ec sub-domain issue. Microsoft's Caller ID spec asks that the SPF TXT record be placed not in the TXT record for the actual domain, but in the _ec sub-domain.
Are people in general following the _ec sub-domain creation, or are they ignoring this?
Thanks,
Ajay Goel
ajay@silicomm.com
Silicomm Corporation
-------
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-help/current/
Donate! http://spf.pobox.com/donations.html
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-help@v2.listbox.com