Mailing List Archive: SPF: Discuss

spfd lets you test SPF queries

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 28, 2003, 12:50 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 28, 2003, 12:50 PM →

Bounce loops

by roy at gnomon | Oct 28, 2003, 9:12 AM | 3 replies →

roy at gnomon

3

Oct 28, 2003, 11:04 AM →

exp field

by spf at thwartedefforts | Oct 28, 2003, 9:17 AM | 0 replies →

spf at thwartedefforts

0

Oct 28, 2003, 9:17 AM →

new draft RFC 90% done.

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 18, 2003, 12:05 AM | 6 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

6

Oct 28, 2003, 7:51 AM →

Waving a flag for version 1

by jasper at pointless | Oct 26, 2003, 6:31 PM | 1 replies →

jasper at pointless

1

Oct 27, 2003, 1:34 PM →

lookups by macro expansion

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 27, 2003, 10:23 AM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Oct 27, 2003, 10:57 AM →

Mail::SPF::Query 1.7pre1 released

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 26, 2003, 10:35 PM | 3 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

3

Oct 27, 2003, 10:53 AM →

revisiting the LocalPart mechanism

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 25, 2003, 6:07 PM | 7 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

7

Oct 27, 2003, 8:19 AM →

"pi" provides draft-01 compatibility

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 26, 2003, 6:46 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 26, 2003, 6:46 PM →

IPv6 expert wanted

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 26, 2003, 1:05 PM | 4 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

4

Oct 26, 2003, 3:37 PM →

ip4-cidr needs clarification

by roy at gnomon | Oct 26, 2003, 8:08 AM | 4 replies →

roy at gnomon

4

Oct 26, 2003, 3:20 PM →

A and MX mechanisms gain CIDR suffixes: a/24, mx/24.

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 26, 2003, 1:51 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 26, 2003, 1:51 PM →

Suggested clarifications for the draft

by roy at gnomon | Oct 26, 2003, 7:32 AM | 0 replies →

roy at gnomon

0

Oct 26, 2003, 7:32 AM →

Why not just use S/MIME or GPG signatures?

by karn at ka9q | Oct 7, 2003, 12:10 AM | 43 replies →

karn at ka9q

43

Oct 26, 2003, 6:57 AM →

new mechanisms RHS and PTRHS

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 25, 2003, 6:56 PM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Oct 25, 2003, 9:58 PM →

SPF now has a blog

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 25, 2003, 6:31 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 25, 2003, 6:31 PM →

small suggestions to the web site about port 25 filtering and rfc2476

by loic.prylli at abbloi | Oct 25, 2003, 7:16 PM | 1 replies →

loic.prylli at abbloi

1

Oct 25, 2003, 6:21 PM →

SPF is only one component in a policy suite

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 24, 2003, 12:30 PM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Oct 24, 2003, 9:10 PM →

primary lavel at top-level domain.com, not _spf

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 23, 2003, 9:38 PM | 3 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

3

Oct 24, 2003, 4:16 PM →

is timestamp in exp string unnecessary?

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 24, 2003, 1:22 PM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Oct 24, 2003, 2:57 PM →

ASRG reconciliation effort in the news, mentions SPF

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 24, 2003, 1:41 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 24, 2003, 1:41 PM →

new draft RFC under construction

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 9, 2003, 9:22 PM | 14 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

14

Oct 24, 2003, 11:27 AM →

include recursion and loop detection

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 24, 2003, 10:51 AM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 24, 2003, 10:51 AM →

A couple of minor questions

by pgladstone at cisco | Oct 24, 2003, 6:21 AM | 0 replies →

pgladstone at cisco

0

Oct 24, 2003, 6:21 AM →

3 nits with draft RFC

by jm at jmason | Oct 24, 2003, 12:22 AM | 1 replies →

jm at jmason

1

Oct 24, 2003, 5:50 AM →