Mailing List Archive: SPF: Discuss

SPF and IPV6

by graham at webwayone | Oct 7, 2003, 12:08 AM | 1 replies →

graham at webwayone

1

Oct 7, 2003, 4:48 AM →

the big challenge of forwarding : rely more on HELO and authorized intermediates?

by loic.prylli at abbloi | Oct 7, 2003, 4:22 AM | 0 replies →

loic.prylli at abbloi

0

Oct 7, 2003, 4:22 AM →

Where are the new draft ?!?!

by justo.alonso at eresmas | Oct 7, 2003, 4:09 AM | 0 replies →

justo.alonso at eresmas

0

Oct 7, 2003, 4:09 AM →

New zone publishing SPF records

by druid at caughq | Oct 6, 2003, 7:09 PM | 1 replies →

druid at caughq

1

Oct 6, 2003, 11:12 PM →

.forward implies recipients must whitelist forwarding hosts

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 4:11 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 6, 2003, 4:11 PM →

Your examples have problems with BIND

by jter at cartmanager | Oct 6, 2003, 1:54 PM | 1 replies →

jter at cartmanager

1

Oct 6, 2003, 4:08 PM →

DynDNS + SPF = :-)

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 12:28 PM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 6, 2003, 12:28 PM →

dyndns

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 12:17 PM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Oct 6, 2003, 12:25 PM →

is there a better solution than sender rewriting?

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 11:06 AM | 2 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

2

Oct 6, 2003, 12:04 PM →

is sender rewriting really necessary?

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 11:21 AM | 2 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

2

Oct 6, 2003, 12:02 PM →

ben@ben.com: you use both "fail" and "deny" in SPF

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 10:26 AM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 6, 2003, 10:26 AM →

Re: MailArmory to support SPF

by mengwong at dumbo | Oct 6, 2003, 9:01 AM | 0 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

0

Oct 6, 2003, 9:01 AM →

Concerns about SPF and ebay messages

by rkml at cyberglobe | Oct 5, 2003, 11:32 PM | 6 replies →

rkml at cyberglobe

6

Oct 6, 2003, 8:14 AM →

reporting possibly outdated link on spf intro

by spf_bug_report_78 at hotmail | Oct 5, 2003, 11:45 PM | 0 replies →

spf_bug_report_78 at hotmail

0

Oct 5, 2003, 11:45 PM →

Re: [off-list] ASRG - RMX proposals update

by mengwong at dumbo | Sep 30, 2003, 5:02 PM | 1 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

1

Sep 30, 2003, 5:20 PM →

SPF introduces configuration directive concept

by mengwong at dumbo | Sep 26, 2003, 11:08 AM | 4 replies →

mengwong at dumbo

4

Sep 29, 2003, 10:00 AM →

postfix patches for spf support

by daniel at yoobay | Sep 25, 2003, 1:06 PM | 0 replies →

daniel at yoobay

0

Sep 25, 2003, 1:06 PM →