Pyspf still had default modifier. I added a flag to turn it off.
However, which is better:
a) Ignore it, to match RFC.
b) Using probably means an older policy, so follow it to more likely
get the intended result.
I think I will make pyspf throw an AmbiguityWarning for it in harsh mode.
Maybe do (b) in lax mode, and (a) in strict mode?
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735
However, which is better:
a) Ignore it, to match RFC.
b) Using probably means an older policy, so follow it to more likely
get the intended result.
I think I will make pyspf throw an AmbiguityWarning for it in harsh mode.
Maybe do (b) in lax mode, and (a) in strict mode?
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735