On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:14:31PM -0400, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:
| We would like to have someone else other than the proposal authors
| coordinate this. Alan DeKok has volunteered. Is he agreeable to you?
Yes, on the condition that we begin to get concrete results by October 16.
I am optimistic that we can work faster once fewer cooks are in the kitchen.
I want to have something to propose at ISPcon on the 21st. If the
unification effort has not made progress by then, I reserve the right to
present SPF as the next best thing. I believe this is justified because
the new technique I described is inclusive and allows users to specify
which actual protocol they want to apply as policy, and is therefore
forward-compatible.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname@©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµøˆ¡
| We would like to have someone else other than the proposal authors
| coordinate this. Alan DeKok has volunteered. Is he agreeable to you?
Yes, on the condition that we begin to get concrete results by October 16.
I am optimistic that we can work faster once fewer cooks are in the kitchen.
I want to have something to propose at ISPcon on the 21st. If the
unification effort has not made progress by then, I reserve the right to
present SPF as the next best thing. I believe this is justified because
the new technique I described is inclusive and allows users to specify
which actual protocol they want to apply as policy, and is therefore
forward-compatible.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname@©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµøˆ¡