Just a minor piece of feedback on
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mengwong-spf-00.txt
Regarding section 3.2, I'd like to suggest changing the following two
sentences to indicate that they are implementation requirements using the
word MUST, as per RFC2119.
Unknown mechanisms cause processing to abort
with the result "unknown". Unknown modifiers
are ignored by clients.
Perhaps this sentence in section 5 should be similarly modified:
While unrecognized mechanisms cause an immediate
"unknown" abort, unrecognized modifiers are simply
ignored.
Thanks,
Daryl Odnert
Tumbleweed Communications
Redwood City, California
daryl.odnert@tumbleweed.com
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mengwong-spf-00.txt
Regarding section 3.2, I'd like to suggest changing the following two
sentences to indicate that they are implementation requirements using the
word MUST, as per RFC2119.
Unknown mechanisms cause processing to abort
with the result "unknown". Unknown modifiers
are ignored by clients.
Perhaps this sentence in section 5 should be similarly modified:
While unrecognized mechanisms cause an immediate
"unknown" abort, unrecognized modifiers are simply
ignored.
Thanks,
Daryl Odnert
Tumbleweed Communications
Redwood City, California
daryl.odnert@tumbleweed.com
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com