> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: Matthew Speed [mailto:mspeed@mspeed.net]
> Skickat: den 15 mars 2004 14:34
> Till: Johan Strand
> Ämne: RE: SPF for Exchange 2000
>
>
> I'll try installing it today and let you know how it goes.
Please make sure you have downloaded the latest version. I found some bugs in version 0.2 and the current version will parse everything correctly. At least the test in the test suit from the reference implementation. The ony thing I know of right now is that the Received-SPF-header isn't always placed at the top of the header list. This will become an issue when more intermediate hosts start checking SPF and adding headers.
> Concerning what to do with the checked mail, have you ever
> used the Spamnet product from Cloudmark? Their product
> integrates into Outlook or Outlook Express and filters spam
> off into a separate folder.
No, I haven't used it. Is it a content analyzing filter?
> I wonder if at some point it
> would be useful to have a program like that that can
> integrate into Outlook that can filter off messages that fail
> the SPF check. The work on the client end shouldn't be too
> tough because it would be simply looking for something in the
> header as oppose to the work that the Spamnet client has to do.
Yes, right now I have some Inbox rules that look at the headers and puts the mail in the correct folder. It works for me, but I know of several of my collegues that will never be able to write that kind of rules (we are a computer consultancy firm...). Maybe a plugin will be easier to use.
/Johan
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com
> Från: Matthew Speed [mailto:mspeed@mspeed.net]
> Skickat: den 15 mars 2004 14:34
> Till: Johan Strand
> Ämne: RE: SPF for Exchange 2000
>
>
> I'll try installing it today and let you know how it goes.
Please make sure you have downloaded the latest version. I found some bugs in version 0.2 and the current version will parse everything correctly. At least the test in the test suit from the reference implementation. The ony thing I know of right now is that the Received-SPF-header isn't always placed at the top of the header list. This will become an issue when more intermediate hosts start checking SPF and adding headers.
> Concerning what to do with the checked mail, have you ever
> used the Spamnet product from Cloudmark? Their product
> integrates into Outlook or Outlook Express and filters spam
> off into a separate folder.
No, I haven't used it. Is it a content analyzing filter?
> I wonder if at some point it
> would be useful to have a program like that that can
> integrate into Outlook that can filter off messages that fail
> the SPF check. The work on the client end shouldn't be too
> tough because it would be simply looking for something in the
> header as oppose to the work that the Spamnet client has to do.
Yes, right now I have some Inbox rules that look at the headers and puts the mail in the correct folder. It works for me, but I know of several of my collegues that will never be able to write that kind of rules (we are a computer consultancy firm...). Maybe a plugin will be easier to use.
/Johan
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com