-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Koen Martens wrote:
> Correct me if i am wrong, but the latest version of Mail::SPF::Query is
> 2 days away form its one-year birthday, i'd say that makes
> Mail::SPF::Query outdated.
(Another late answer by me.) Yes, M:S:Q is quite dated, and there are
plans[1,2] to rewrite it as a new reference implementation. I have it on
my TODO list, and I'll tend to it as soon as the SPFv1 specification is
declared final (which should be real soon now).
References:
1. http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Meeting/2005-01-15
2. http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Resolution/20
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgT0twL7PKlBZWjsRAhqaAJ9W3b8okT7haeT4N15u5t6b/JIRLgCfXFj6
VjECm2zodiGrYk/kgr4ZhaE=
=ha2z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com
Hash: SHA1
Koen Martens wrote:
> Correct me if i am wrong, but the latest version of Mail::SPF::Query is
> 2 days away form its one-year birthday, i'd say that makes
> Mail::SPF::Query outdated.
(Another late answer by me.) Yes, M:S:Q is quite dated, and there are
plans[1,2] to rewrite it as a new reference implementation. I have it on
my TODO list, and I'll tend to it as soon as the SPFv1 specification is
declared final (which should be real soon now).
References:
1. http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Meeting/2005-01-15
2. http://spf.mehnle.net/Council_Resolution/20
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgT0twL7PKlBZWjsRAhqaAJ9W3b8okT7haeT4N15u5t6b/JIRLgCfXFj6
VjECm2zodiGrYk/kgr4ZhaE=
=ha2z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-devel@v2.listbox.com