Mailing List Archive

From: "Butrus orman" <landy@despiertapr.com>

> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pepino.despiertapr.com
> X-Spam-Level: ****
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=4.8 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_50_60,
> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.63
>
>
> why was it tag no if it meets the requiered hits?

Likely that was roundoff errors. It might really have been 4.79.
{^_^}

----- Original Message -----
From: "Butrus orman" <landy@despiertapr.com>
To: "SpamAssassin Mailing List" <spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 7:02 AM
Subject: tag as no


> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pepino.despiertapr.com
> X-Spam-Level: ****
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=4.8 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_50_60,
> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.63
>
>
> why was it tag no if it meets the requiered hits?
>

Possible roundoff, and make sure you have autolearn turned on in local.cf

Roundoff error in the display, most likely. This comes up every so often
and there is a Wiki entry on it.

Loren

> why was it tag no if it meets the requiered hits?
>

John Fleming wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>
>
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
>>pepino.despiertapr.com
>>X-Spam-Level: ****
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=4.8 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_50_60,
>>HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.63
>>
>>
>>why was it tag no if it meets the requiered hits?
>>
>>
>Possible roundoff, and make sure you have autolearn turned on in local.cf
>
>
Yes, definitely feed these close ones to bayes via sa-learn. It doesn't
appear that Butrus has it turned on yet.

- Bob