Mailing List Archive

1 2 3  View All
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, Loren Wilton wrote:

> You note that "gay" has a different meaning today. As far as I know, the
> words "black" and "white" were not systematically used to refer to skin
> colors before about 1963, when a movement was set afoot in the USA to replace
> "negro" with "black" and "caucasian" with "white".

As I mentioned in a post on July 14, black and white to refer to races
and skin color (and also red and yellow) gained traction at least as
far back as the European Enlightenment, when it was all the rage to
classify things, and most Enlightenment writers are explicitly racist
in their descriptions and classification. But these terms are used
going back thousands of years as well. My post from the 14th includes
several links you might find informative.

--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/ | System Admin - UT CompSci
=----------------------------------+-------------------------------
All syllogisms contain three lines | shanew@shanew.net
Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.ischool.utexas.edu/~shanew
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
> Rather than tolerate the tiniest of changes you throw a tantrum.

This is not a tiny change. I had hoped it would be, which is why I
supported it in the initial PMC vote, but it's becoming clear to me I was
overly optimistic.


--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no better measure of the unthinking contempt of the
environmentalist movement for civilization than their call to
turn off the lights and sit in the dark. -- Sultan Knish
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
104 days until the Presidential Election
RE: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
> This is not a tiny change. I had hoped it would be, which is why I
supported it
> in the initial PMC vote, but it's becoming clear to me I was overly
optimistic.

Wait until you have to vote on the use of the word welcomelist.
Preferring English to other languages could be seen as discriminative.
If one should replace words, than at least use Esperanto ones. ;)
RE: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 7/21/2020 9:25 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>> I do strongly wonder whether this is "society" or only "people in the
>> USA".
> One data point disproves that.? The SA project made the choice months
> ago inspired by a decision in the United Kingdom:
>
https://www.zdnet.com/article/uk-ncsc-to-stop-using-whitelist-and-blacklist-
due-to-racial-stereotyping/

I've stayed out of this until now because I understand what you are trying
to do, but this was not an issue of race until those who (just like the
article) made it so.

I am a white male aged 62 who grew up in the 60's and 70's in a very
racially integrated area of a very poor part of a decent sized Midwest
united states city in Indiana. I went through the forced integration bussing
in a junior high school that mainly consisted of poor "white trash" lower
income white families. There really wasn't much tension in the school system
until poor lower income black students were forced to be bussed in along
with wealthy upper class white students from other schools. The black
students raised holy hell (riots and all) because they were forced out of
their schools and the well to do white students were nearly as bad for
exactly the same reason and we (the original group of lower class whites
students) were pissed because we had to deal with pissed off kids from both
spectrums. This was not a problem until people forced a non issue into a
boiling point issue. Being one of the poorest "white trash" families in the
school in the first place and having been raised to see race as a non issue
I had friends in all three of the spheres and most of them just wanted
things stop and didn't understand what the fuss was all about, they were
fine with things as they had been. You know where none of this EVER crept
in? Athletics... All those involved in athletics just wanted winning teams
and didn't give a rats ass about what color the guy was playing next to them
only that they performed. The problem wasn't integration of kids it was
making sure each school had access to the same resources, that neighborhoods
were naturally integrated and no barrier existed to the flow of people based
on color, race or religion. Forcing those kids out of their neighborhood
school did nothing positive because they still went home at the end of the
day (and took longer to get there) and their position in life remained the
same (other than seeing all the nice things the wealthy kids had I guess).
They were still poor and black, I was still poor and white and the tension
and resulting violence just took a chunk of our childhood to a place it
didn't need to go.

Now, white and black lists were not a racially charged item until someone,
likely white guy but I don't know, made it so. I have asked my colleagues of
all races what they think about this and linux's new issues with the terms
black and white list and, especially the black persons find it somewhat
insulting.

Black and white have been the representation of pure good and evil since man
kind found a way out of the dark. Dark was bad, you were more likely to be
hunted in the dark, light was good as you were far safer hence black magic
bad white magic good and most cultures who believe in the two are of dark
skin. Certainly the black west African practitioners of voodoo (common term
for several related religions) knew they were of black skin when they
assigned black magic to magic used for harmful purpose while white magic was
used for good and healing... It was just light and dark and that is what the
terms white and black are used for.

How about blackballing? Remember McCarthy blackballing people in the 50's...
Had nothing to do with color then or now. Why is the Sabbath preceding Tisha
B?Av referred to as Black Sabbath? Nothing to do with skin color.

I won't speak of this again but this entire overreaction to race issues
literally feeds the flame every bit as much as black rappers using the
*nword* as their own continues to feed the use of the word. I had hoped
during my life time that word would be gone but it's clear from this
discussion that people cannot just simply decide not to engage in racist
behavior and stop emphasizing trouble where an issue doesn't exist until you
make it an issue. I do not believe a single person of color on this list
ever once looked at the terms white and black list and saw a race issue and
if they did, this will not solve their actual personal problems.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
* Charles Sprickman:

> Rather than tolerate the tiniest of changes you throw a tantrum.

"Tiny changes", as in small stones getting kicked down a slope, causing
an avalanche. Attempts to restrict vocabulary should be a very familiar
and worrying concept to anyone who read Orwell. Speaking out against
this is very necessary. Silently tolerating stupid changes stems from
either weakness, lack of understanding or disinterest.

-Ralph
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 20200722 15:17:03, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Charles Sprickman:
>
>> Rather than tolerate the tiniest of changes you throw a tantrum.
>
> "Tiny changes", as in small stones getting kicked down a slope, causing
> an avalanche. Attempts to restrict vocabulary should be a very familiar
> and worrying concept to anyone who read Orwell. Speaking out against
> this is very necessary. Silently tolerating stupid changes stems from
> either weakness, lack of understanding or disinterest.
>
> -Ralph

It is a technique that predated Orwell's story and even predated my birth. At
the very least the Germans tried to frame their arguments by restricting
vocabulary. Stalin certainly did. Mao certainly did.

I am glad somebody else feels this is as important an issue as I do.

{^_^}
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Has it occurred to ANYONE arguing over this that the source code of
SpamAssassin is Open Source so if you do not like the politically
correct change that was made to appease the Snowflakes, that it is
not that difficult to write a patch that will switch the distribution
back to the old wording?

You could even fork the SpamAssassin code if you like, you know. In
fact, let's do that. We will make a new fork and call it the
"SpamAssasin-N-W" short for SpamAssassin Non Wussy, put it up on
Sorceforge for download, and just mirror the regular SpamAssassin
distribution when new releases come out with the exception of this
change.

Jdow do you volunteer to manage the Non-Wussy version of SpamAssassin?

Ted
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 21:53 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> You could even fork the SpamAssassin code if you like, you know. In
> fact, let's do that. We will make a new fork and call it the
> "SpamAssasin-N-W" short for SpamAssassin Non Wussy, put it up on
> Sorceforge for download, and just mirror the regular SpamAssassin
> distribution when new releases come out with the exception of this
> change.
>
That would be fine for the Perl source code, but in case you didn't
notice, the terms-we-must-not-use ALSO appear in visible text, i.e.
names of base rules, which can't be hidden from SA users. Changing them
WILL break some private rules written by SA users who don't subscribe to
this mailing list and so will not be expecting any such change.

AFAICT this side effect was not considered by the SA maintainers until
the name of one base rule was changed a week or so back and some list
members' rules were broken by it. I'm not blaming the maintainers
because something like that is very easy to miss: its a fair bet that
base rule names no not appear anywhere in SA source code.

OK, Post SA 4.0 it appears that there's a plot to maintain both old and
new-style rule names for a while, but I predict that there will be much
wailing and gnashing of teeth from those who are not on this list when
either some name change is missed or further down the line the old names
vanish and all those who never update software get caught out.

Martin,

who is a retired professional developer and has seen this sort of thing
before.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Note: If you fork a project, you cannot use the name, just the code. For
SA, You would need your own update system. Rules are also open source so
you can use them but would have to rename many especially those with
initials. And remove / gain permission for thhe rules that are 3rd party
used with permission.

Rules that work for 3.3.x to 3.4.x have been published and maintain
backwards compatibility with scoring, local meta rules and any template
processing.

With 4.0 you will have a one byte change if you want to use the old rules.

Regards, KAM

>
>
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2020-07-23 16:06:
> Note: If you fork a project, you cannot use the name, just the code.

so rspamd cant make support to spamassassin rules without permission to
change rules names ?, but thay did, wonderfull world of help each other
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 23/07/20 16:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:

>
> so rspamd cant make support to spamassassin rules without permission
> to change rules names ?, but thay did, wonderfull world of help each
> other
I think that rspamd's approach is correct. Rspamd just takes SA rules
and use them. It doesn't provide the rules, meaning that you most likely
need to have an installation of at least sa-update on the same machine
that runs rspamd to keep rules updated.
SA rules are also distributed under Apache 2.0 license and I guess that
license permits reuse of existing code in other projects, but IANAL :)

--
Best regards,
Riccardo Alfieri

Spamhaus Technology
https://www.spamhaustech.com/
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2020-07-23 17:01:
> On 23/07/20 16:53, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> so rspamd cant make support to spamassassin rules without permission
>> to change rules names ?, but thay
>> did, wonderfull world of help each other
> I think that rspamd's approach is correct.

i am not a jura student :=)

> Rspamd just takes SA rules
> and use them.

yes its read native sa rules, and hope it can on read transfer it to a
rspamd view in ucl

> It doesn't provide the rules, meaning that you most
> likely need to have an installation of at least sa-update on the same
> machine that runs rspamd to keep rules updated.

if the need is to have its updated yes, but sa can have static rules for
ever :=)

> SA rules are also distributed under Apache 2.0 license and I guess
> that license permits reuse of existing code in other projects, but
> IANAL :)

yes i think if mimedefang was so good it would have being more
dokumented, as i see it to much was done in mimedefang and not
implemented in spamassassin, so all was needed to have a non working
problems with mimedefang, thats imho why its dead beaf now ?

basicly i am just happy that fuglu exists now
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 15:01 +0000, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> I think that rspamd's approach is correct. Rspamd just takes SA rules
> and use them. It doesn't provide the rules, meaning that you most
> likely
> need to have an installation of at least sa-update on the same
> machine
> that runs rspamd to keep rules updated.
> SA rules are also distributed under Apache 2.0 license and I guess
> that
> license permits reuse of existing code in other projects, but IANAL :)
>
I had a look at the Rspamd docs and thought about it bit.

Yes, they can run your private rules and, probably, some of the base
rules, but that's about it:

- They don't seem to have a way to let SA rules find out anything about
which UBLs have fired or to include that info in an SA rule.

- Similarly, because its a C program, there's no simple way to execute
an SA plugin without running it as an external Perl process. To do
that you'd also need to provide some way of passing input data to it
and of receiving the reply.

They also say that running a heap of regexes in Rspamd will slow it down
noticeably.


Martin
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Was it really that unclear that I was speaking tongue-in-cheek?

Man o Man I missed my calling in life. I should have gone into scamming
people if I was able to get you guys to think that load of BS about
forking was serious!!!!

Ted

On 7/23/2020 7:06 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Note: If you fork a project, you cannot use the name, just the code.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
> On Jul 23, 2020, at 2:29 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm@ipinc.net> wrote:
>
>
> Was it really that unclear that I was speaking tongue-in-cheek?
>
> Man o Man I missed my calling in life. I should have gone into scamming
> people if I was able to get you guys to think that load of BS about
> forking was serious!!!!
>
> Ted
>
> On 7/23/2020 7:06 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Note: If you fork a project, you cannot use the name, just the code.

I do wish that the handful of loud, non-contributors who have so much to say about someone else’s project would shut up and fork it, TBH.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 24/07/2020 04:29, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> Was it really that unclear that I was speaking tongue-in-cheek?
>
> Man o Man I missed my calling in life. I should have gone into scamming
> people if I was able to get you guys to think that load of BS about
> forking was serious!!!!
>
> Ted
>
> On 7/23/2020 7:06 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> Note: If you fork a project, you cannot use the name, just the code.

there is currently a large CC discussion at present with about 18 odd
people from this list (no I didnt start it, but was in CC list) who have
been discussing forking, your post might have been sarcasm, but it
actually reflects reality.

The fact the OP never included you means they knew you were being
sarcastic, kevin cant see that because he is in total defensive mode, he
thought people would suck up his dictatorship and roll over and move on,
but he was so so so wrong.

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete
all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
RE: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
>> I do wish that the handful of loud, non-contributors who have so
>> much to say about someone else’s project would shut up and fork it,
TBH.

Is that not a lot like, this is my toilet it is only for white people,
please
build your own somewhere else, you are free to do so?
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
I think that one of the reasons why more and more people dogpile on
the conversation is because a lot of people have already dogpiled on
it.
I've been in this mailing list since 2015 and this has been the
loudest thread I've noticed since then.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Marc Roos <M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
>
>
> >> I do wish that the handful of loud, non-contributors who have so
> >> much to say about someone else’s project would shut up and fork it,
> TBH.
>
> Is that not a lot like, this is my toilet it is only for white people,
> please
> build your own somewhere else, you are free to do so?
>
>
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 03:24:

> The fact the OP never included you means they knew you were being
> sarcastic, kevin cant see that because he is in total defensive mode,
> he thought people would suck up his dictatorship and roll over and
> move on, but he was so so so wrong.

is PMC members ROFL right now ? :=)

>
> --

why big SIGNATURES on publib maillist ?
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 24/07/2020 22:01, Benny Pedersen wrote:

> Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 03:24:
>
>> The fact the OP never included you means they knew you were being
>> sarcastic, kevin cant see that because he is in total defensive mode,
>> he thought people would suck up his dictatorship and roll over and
>> move on, but he was so so so wrong.
>
> is PMC members ROFL right now ? :=)

ask him, thats if he can hear you over those dark voices telling him to
be a dictator

> why big SIGNATURES on publib maillist ?

because it shits trolls like you off

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete
all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57:

> because it shits trolls like you off

https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
Arrg do we have to invoke the "Toilet Rule"* ?

Would everyone calm down if Kevin would promise to never make another
change to bow to the gods of Political Correctness? Kevin, would you
be humble enough to make this promise and admit you stepped in a
pile of caw-caw?

I'm sure the real spammers are just scratching their heads over this
one. For years they have tried attacking SA through all manner of
technical games when all along all they had to do to divide and conquer
is get us to start fighting over colors!!!!

Ted


*Toilet Rule - any online discussion that has reached the point where
someone makes a reference to a toilet needs to be flushed... ;-)

On 7/24/2020 3:00 AM, Jeroen de Neef wrote:
> I think that one of the reasons why more and more people dogpile on
> the conversation is because a lot of people have already dogpiled on
> it.
> I've been in this mailing list since 2015 and this has been the
> loudest thread I've noticed since then.
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 9:49 AM Marc Roos<M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> I do wish that the handful of loud, non-contributors who have so
>> >> much to say about someone else’s project would shut up and fork it,
>> TBH.
>>
>> Is that not a lot like, this is my toilet it is only for white people,
>> please
>> build your own somewhere else, you are free to do so?
>>
>>
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 24/07/2020 23:26, Benny Pedersen wrote:

> Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57:
>
>> because it shits trolls like you off
>
> https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk

dunno what you referenced benny I only click on links that are from
friends/family/trusted sources - which you are none of

but your so stupid you forget most people on this list are seasoned
network/system admins and take the same approach.

--
Regards,
Noel Butler

This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete
all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
On 7/24/20 7:41 PM, Noel Butler wrote:

> On 24/07/2020 23:26, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
>> Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57:
>>
>>> because it shits trolls like you off
>>
>> https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8IkQZsir2aUw-H919hk
>
>
> dunno what you referenced benny I only click on links that are from
> friends/family/trusted sources - which you are none of
>
> but your so stupid you forget most people on this list are seasoned
> network/system admins and take the same approach.
>
What.. you can't look at a photo on the net, and protect yourself in the
process?  Some of us really ARE seasoned network/system admins - who
know how to follow links without getting hacked.

Jeez... talk about trolls.



--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra

Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but no one knows why.
In our lab, theory and practice are combined:
nothing works and no one knows why. ... unknown
Re: Why the new changes need to be "depricated" forever [ In reply to ]
>>>
> On 7/24/20 7:41 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> On 24/07/2020 23:26, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>
Noel Butler skrev den 2020-07-24 14:57:
>>>
>>>> because it shits trolls like you off
>>>
>>>
> https://imgur.com/pHlUeZY?fbclid=IwAR2l8HBDnXST5-adnmyIbBAsq16sZeGNhfqHwBNM8I
> kQZsir2aUw-H919hk
>>
>>
>> dunno what you referenced benny I only click on links that are from
>> friends/family/trusted sources - which you are none of
>>
>> but your so stupid you forget most people on this list are seasoned
>> network/system admins and take the same approach.
>>
> What.. you can't look at a photo on the net, and protect yourself in the
> process? Some of us really ARE seasoned network/system admins - who
> know how to follow links without getting hacked.
>
> Jeez... talk about trolls.
>
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
>

Yes, well . . .

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/practice-and-theory/

https://checkyourfact.com/2019/08/28/yogi-berra-theory-difference-practice/



---------------------------------
j4computers, llc
Stone Ridge, NY 12484
845-687-3734
www.j4computers.com
---------------------------------

1 2 3  View All