Mailing List Archive: [Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 27, 2004, 8:51 PM

Post #1 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

felicity@kluge.net changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Summary|Non-fatal problems building |[review] Non-fatal problems
|3.0.0-pre1 as RPM |building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM

------- Additional Comments From felicity@kluge.net 2004-06-27 20:51 -------
updating summary

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 27, 2004, 8:54 PM

Post #2 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

------- Additional Comments From quinlan@pathname.com 2004-06-27 20:54 -------
+1

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 27, 2004, 9:03 PM

Post #3 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2004-06-27 21:03 -------
+1

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 27, 2004, 9:29 PM

Post #4 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

felicity@kluge.net changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED

------- Additional Comments From felicity@kluge.net 2004-06-27 21:29 -------
committed. r22226

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 28, 2004, 4:28 PM

Post #5 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

------- Additional Comments From shiva@sewingwitch.com 2004-06-28 16:28 -------
The spamc permission denied issue is because $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/spamc is
installed with permissions 555. I'm looking at the Makefile to see why this is
happening. My umask is 0002, normal for a RH system I believe.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 28, 2004, 4:44 PM

Post #6 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

------- Additional Comments From shiva@sewingwitch.com 2004-06-28 16:44 -------
Looks like an issue with ExtUtils::Install
(/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.3/ExtUtils/Install.pm) in FC2. At line 183:

$mode = 0444 | ( $mode & 0111 ? 0111 : 0 );

This affects all binaries installed with this package. For SA, spamc is the only
ELF binary. All others are Perl.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 3535] [review] Non-fatal problems building 3.0.0-pre1 as RPM [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla

Jun 28, 2004, 5:01 PM

Post #7 of 7 (50 views)

http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3535

------- Additional Comments From shiva@sewingwitch.com 2004-06-28 17:01 -------
Looks like an RPM issue. I've filed the bugzilla here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112429

We can ignore the error for now, at the cost of a bigger unstripped spamc
binary. If stripping is important, it can be done explicitly.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.