http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3479
Summary: SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS should be reinstated
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: jm@jmason.org
we currently have:
header __SPF_PASS eval:check_for_spf_pass()
header __SPF_HELO_PASS eval:check_for_spf_helo_pass()
presumably the idea is that a user who *wants* to allow SPF passes to give
nonspam points can do:
meta SPF_PASS (__SPF_PASS)
however, that's not going to work for users on machines where spamd is used,
since they are not allowed to define rules. instead, we should just issue
the rules with a minimal score, one that will not have any real effect unless
the user changes it with a
score SPF_PASS -2.0
or whatever. normal users are permitted to do that.
fix attached.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Summary: SPF_PASS and SPF_HELO_PASS should be reinstated
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: jm@jmason.org
we currently have:
header __SPF_PASS eval:check_for_spf_pass()
header __SPF_HELO_PASS eval:check_for_spf_helo_pass()
presumably the idea is that a user who *wants* to allow SPF passes to give
nonspam points can do:
meta SPF_PASS (__SPF_PASS)
however, that's not going to work for users on machines where spamd is used,
since they are not allowed to define rules. instead, we should just issue
the rules with a minimal score, one that will not have any real effect unless
the user changes it with a
score SPF_PASS -2.0
or whatever. normal users are permitted to do that.
fix attached.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.