http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2894
Summary: Spelling Checker
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: elliot@greenbaynet.com
It was brought up in a slashdot.org posting that we should utilize a spelling/grammar checker in
SA. The idea is that rather than trying to catch many different spellings of common spams, we do
the opposite: we tag higher those messages with high rates of uncommon misspellings. It could be
"exponential" type increase with each additional misspelling.
I don't know how workable this is as I have never actually written a SA rule test, but I thought I
would pass along a seemingly good idea. Happy New Year, SA team!
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Summary: Spelling Checker
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: spamassassin-dev@incubator.apache.org
ReportedBy: elliot@greenbaynet.com
It was brought up in a slashdot.org posting that we should utilize a spelling/grammar checker in
SA. The idea is that rather than trying to catch many different spellings of common spams, we do
the opposite: we tag higher those messages with high rates of uncommon misspellings. It could be
"exponential" type increase with each additional misspelling.
I don't know how workable this is as I have never actually written a SA rule test, but I thought I
would pass along a seemingly good idea. Happy New Year, SA team!
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.