Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Spamassassin Wiki" for change notification.
The following page has been changed by JustinMason:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TopSharedMemoryBug
The comment on the change is:
added introductory note
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= When I look at 'top', the spamd processes are not sharing enough memory =
+
+ Here's a sample output from "top" viewing two spamd processes:
{{{
PID USER PR NI CODE VIRT RES SHR nDRT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
@@ -8, +10 @@
7409 jm 17 0 964 34300 31m 2280 0 0.0 3.1 0:00 perl
}}}
- Looking at the above 'top' output, it appears that the two spamd processes
+ Looking at the above 'top' output, it appears that the two processes
listed are sharing a pitiful 2280KB of memory pages -- 3.4% of their total memory usage. However, all's not as it seems.
Are you running Linux? If so, this is an annoying bug somewhere between 'top' and Linux memory management.
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Spamassassin Wiki" for change notification.
The following page has been changed by JustinMason:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TopSharedMemoryBug
The comment on the change is:
added introductory note
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= When I look at 'top', the spamd processes are not sharing enough memory =
+
+ Here's a sample output from "top" viewing two spamd processes:
{{{
PID USER PR NI CODE VIRT RES SHR nDRT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
@@ -8, +10 @@
7409 jm 17 0 964 34300 31m 2280 0 0.0 3.1 0:00 perl
}}}
- Looking at the above 'top' output, it appears that the two spamd processes
+ Looking at the above 'top' output, it appears that the two processes
listed are sharing a pitiful 2280KB of memory pages -- 3.4% of their total memory usage. However, all's not as it seems.
Are you running Linux? If so, this is an annoying bug somewhere between 'top' and Linux memory management.