Mailing List Archive

RT::Extension::OneTimeTo
Hi,

this extension wasn't updated for the last 2 years.
Because of this, it is also not listed on your RT Extensions page.

Maybe if you have time you could give it a quick update.

I also wanted to ask if this extension is maybe a candidate for
integration in RT 4.4.

Chris
Re: RT::Extension::OneTimeTo [ In reply to ]
Hey Christian,

I'm curious here. What is the use case for not using the one-time-cc
field instead?

Cheers,

-m

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Christian Loos <cloos@netcologne.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this extension wasn't updated for the last 2 years.
> Because of this, it is also not listed on your RT Extensions page.
>
> Maybe if you have time you could give it a quick update.
>
> I also wanted to ask if this extension is maybe a candidate for
> integration in RT 4.4.
>
> Chris
Re: RT::Extension::OneTimeTo [ In reply to ]
Hi Matt,

If I receive a mail and I'm not in To and only in Cc this means: "I can
read this mail if I want but I can also delete it without reading".

I often heard that people use the mail headers for interpreting
responsibilities for this mail:
To: this one is responsible for answering the mail and acting upon
Cc and Bcc: are also notified but don't have to answer or act upon

Chris

Am 10.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Matt Zagrabelny:
> Hey Christian,
>
> I'm curious here. What is the use case for not using the one-time-cc
> field instead?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -m
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Christian Loos <cloos@netcologne.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this extension wasn't updated for the last 2 years.
>> Because of this, it is also not listed on your RT Extensions page.
>>
>> Maybe if you have time you could give it a quick update.
>>
>> I also wanted to ask if this extension is maybe a candidate for
>> integration in RT 4.4.
>>
>> Chris
Re: RT::Extension::OneTimeTo [ In reply to ]
Le 10/02/2015 16:24, Christian Loos a écrit :
> Hi Matt,
>
> If I receive a mail and I'm not in To and only in Cc this means: "I can
> read this mail if I want but I can also delete it without reading".
>
> I often heard that people use the mail headers for interpreting
> responsibilities for this mail:
> To: this one is responsible for answering the mail and acting upon
> Cc and Bcc: are also notified but don't have to answer or act upon
>
>

+1

I also have this problem with some of my customers ;)

--
Easter-eggs Spécialiste GNU/Linux
44-46 rue de l'Ouest - 75014 Paris - France - Métro Gaité
Phone: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 37 - Fax: +33 (0) 1 43 35 00 76
mailto:elacour@easter-eggs.com - http://www.easter-eggs.com
Re: RT::Extension::OneTimeTo [ In reply to ]
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:59:10 +0100 Christian Loos <cloos@netcologne.de> wrote:
> this extension wasn't updated for the last 2 years.
> Because of this, it is also not listed on your RT Extensions page.
>
> Maybe if you have time you could give it a quick update.

I've pushed version 1.00, with increased version dependencies.
- Alex