Mailing List Archive

Routers changed to down: after upgrade
I recently upgraded our rancid installation to version 2.3.1 from
2.2.somthing, and have an odd little issue.

I get a blank "Routers changed to down:" message every run for each
group that doesn't have any routers in the down state. If I add
something like "junk:cisco:down" to each group's router.db, then I don't
get any further "Routers changed to down:" messages after the next run
that reports the "junk" one.

Any suggestions? I can, of course, leave the junk line in my router.db
files, but that's not very aesthetically pleasing.

--Stafford
Routers changed to down: after upgrade [ In reply to ]
We are seeing this exact same problem after upgrading from 2.3.1 to 2.2.2. We are running RANCID for multiple cities, but not
seeing this empty "down" message on all of our cities. Has anyone else seen and/or have a fix for this?


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rancid-discuss@shrubbery.net
[mailto:owner-rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net]On Behalf Of Stafford A. Rau
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:57 PM
To: rancid-discuss at shrubbery.net
Subject: Routers changed to down: after upgrade


I recently upgraded our rancid installation to version 2.3.1 from
2.2.somthing, and have an odd little issue.

I get a blank "Routers changed to down:" message every run for each
group that doesn't have any routers in the down state. If I add
something like "junk:cisco:down" to each group's router.db, then I don't
get any further "Routers changed to down:" messages after the next run
that reports the "junk" one.

Any suggestions? I can, of course, leave the junk line in my router.db
files, but that's not very aesthetically pleasing.

--Stafford
Routers changed to down: after upgrade [ In reply to ]
Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:57:17AM -0700, Stafford A. Rau:
> I recently upgraded our rancid installation to version 2.3.1 from
> 2.2.somthing, and have an odd little issue.
>
> I get a blank "Routers changed to down:" message every run for each
> group that doesn't have any routers in the down state. If I add
> something like "junk:cisco:down" to each group's router.db, then I don't
> get any further "Routers changed to down:" messages after the next run
> that reports the "junk" one.
>
> Any suggestions? I can, of course, leave the junk line in my router.db
> files, but that's not very aesthetically pleasing.
>
> --Stafford

Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 11:06:06AM -0500, Bill Rowan:
> We are seeing this exact same problem after upgrading from 2.3.1 to 2.2.2. We are running RANCID for multiple cities, but not
> seeing this empty "down" message on all of our cities. Has anyone else seen and/or have a fix for this?

I suspect that you're both using solaris and the PATH that is in rancid.conf
is causing control_rancid to pick-up a diff(1) that does not support -u.

you can adjust the PATH or try reinstalling with this patch for autoconf:

ftp://ftp.shrubbery.net/pub/rancid/rancid-2.3.1.p1
Routers changed to down: after upgrade [ In reply to ]
* john heasley <heas at shrubbery.net> [040716 08:48]:
>
> I suspect that you're both using solaris and the PATH that is in rancid.conf
> is causing control_rancid to pick-up a diff(1) that does not support -u.
>
> you can adjust the PATH or try reinstalling with this patch for autoconf:
>
> ftp://ftp.shrubbery.net/pub/rancid/rancid-2.3.1.p1

Changing the PATH in rancid.conf so that GNU diff gets picked up first
rather than Solaris diff seems to have done the trick.

Thanks much (again),
--Stafford