Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de> writes:
>
>(I'm still missing a possibility for declaring a message remote, in
>contrast to virtualdomains which declares a message local...)
>
I was under the impression that omitting a message's domain
(that is, the domain in the envelope recipient address) from
control/locals and control/virtualdomains declares it to be
remote.
If the domain is in control/rcpthosts, it will be accepted via
SMTP and relayed according to control/smtproutes or higher
priority MX records.
-Greg
--
Greg Andrews West Coast Online
Unix System Administrator 5800 Redwood Drive
gerg@wco.com Rohnert Park CA 94928
(yes, 'greg' backwards) 1-800-WCO-INTERNET
>
>(I'm still missing a possibility for declaring a message remote, in
>contrast to virtualdomains which declares a message local...)
>
I was under the impression that omitting a message's domain
(that is, the domain in the envelope recipient address) from
control/locals and control/virtualdomains declares it to be
remote.
If the domain is in control/rcpthosts, it will be accepted via
SMTP and relayed according to control/smtproutes or higher
priority MX records.
-Greg
--
Greg Andrews West Coast Online
Unix System Administrator 5800 Redwood Drive
gerg@wco.com Rohnert Park CA 94928
(yes, 'greg' backwards) 1-800-WCO-INTERNET