-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Currently in the process of replacing a server that was running qmail with
John Simpson's combined patch.
As far as I can tell John's combined patch is no longer being maintained
https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml so I'm wondering
whether s/qmail would be a suitable replacement in terms of functionality
and management?
We're currently using greylisting and on some sending IP addresses Bruce
Guenter's qmail-qfilter.
Don't think there's anything else out of the ordinary in the run scripts.
- --
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAlxNvMYACgkQjFUB2JvnEPnHzACgmX2fhIst/EBNeP9lyjl33ct4
mn0An10S/+9MIt4wtLJzMgluPgRhhGyW
=uLte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Currently in the process of replacing a server that was running qmail with
John Simpson's combined patch.
As far as I can tell John's combined patch is no longer being maintained
https://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml so I'm wondering
whether s/qmail would be a suitable replacement in terms of functionality
and management?
We're currently using greylisting and on some sending IP addresses Bruce
Guenter's qmail-qfilter.
Don't think there's anything else out of the ordinary in the run scripts.
- --
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:niamh@fullbore.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iEYEARECAAYFAlxNvMYACgkQjFUB2JvnEPnHzACgmX2fhIst/EBNeP9lyjl33ct4
mn0An10S/+9MIt4wtLJzMgluPgRhhGyW
=uLte
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----