William Tanksley wrote:
> I have a certain amount of leeriness about posting advocacy on unrelated
> NGs, so I'll limit myself to saying that the difference is years, not
> miles. The two machines work differently: one is a glorified organizer,
> the other is a pocket computer. Both of them can fool you into thinking
> they're something else, because they're both powerful.
>
> I need a personal organizer.
To each his own. :-) Don't you wish all flame were required to end like that
(i.e. before they started?)
> >> I used Quartus on my Crypto exam to solve a modular equation after I
> >> forgot how to solve modular equations (I had it use brute force).
>
> >Wow! I wish I had had my E100 when I was in college. I just realized how
> >awesome that would have been. :-)
>
> Oh yeah.
>
> Actually, I sometimes miss my old OmniGo, which was a pocket computer, in
> spite of being slower than the Pilot for some tasks. I really needed the
> glorified organizer (and had been fooled into thinking that the OmniGo was
> one), but the OmniGo had some abilties that the Pilot doesn't.
I'm not familiar with the OmniGo. Got a link for me?
> >The SECOND time I saw that sig was in ESR's mail. The first was mine. I doubt
> >ESR copied mine, but who knows? :-)
>
> You mean you wrote it? If so, there seems to have crept into it a bug --
> one of the implicit unpackings don't work.
No, I didn't write it. It was written by the all-talented AMK. I did write a
nifty version of Bruuce Schneier's Solitaire algorithm, though. check out:
http://www.counterpane.com/solitaire.html
Mordy
--
o Mordy Ovits
o Cryptographic Engineer
o LockStar Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/local/bin/python
from sys import*;from string import*;a=argv;[s,p,q]=filter(lambda x:x[:1]!=
'-',a);d='-d'in a;e,n=atol(p,16),atol(q,16);l=(len(q)+1)/2;o,inb=l-d,l-1+d
while s:s=stdin.read(inb);s and map(stdout.write,map(lambda i,b=pow(reduce(
lambda x,y:(x<<8L)+y,map(ord,s)),e,n):chr(b>>8*i&255),range(o-1,-1,-1)))
> I have a certain amount of leeriness about posting advocacy on unrelated
> NGs, so I'll limit myself to saying that the difference is years, not
> miles. The two machines work differently: one is a glorified organizer,
> the other is a pocket computer. Both of them can fool you into thinking
> they're something else, because they're both powerful.
>
> I need a personal organizer.
To each his own. :-) Don't you wish all flame were required to end like that
(i.e. before they started?)
> >> I used Quartus on my Crypto exam to solve a modular equation after I
> >> forgot how to solve modular equations (I had it use brute force).
>
> >Wow! I wish I had had my E100 when I was in college. I just realized how
> >awesome that would have been. :-)
>
> Oh yeah.
>
> Actually, I sometimes miss my old OmniGo, which was a pocket computer, in
> spite of being slower than the Pilot for some tasks. I really needed the
> glorified organizer (and had been fooled into thinking that the OmniGo was
> one), but the OmniGo had some abilties that the Pilot doesn't.
I'm not familiar with the OmniGo. Got a link for me?
> >The SECOND time I saw that sig was in ESR's mail. The first was mine. I doubt
> >ESR copied mine, but who knows? :-)
>
> You mean you wrote it? If so, there seems to have crept into it a bug --
> one of the implicit unpackings don't work.
No, I didn't write it. It was written by the all-talented AMK. I did write a
nifty version of Bruuce Schneier's Solitaire algorithm, though. check out:
http://www.counterpane.com/solitaire.html
Mordy
--
o Mordy Ovits
o Cryptographic Engineer
o LockStar Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/local/bin/python
from sys import*;from string import*;a=argv;[s,p,q]=filter(lambda x:x[:1]!=
'-',a);d='-d'in a;e,n=atol(p,16),atol(q,16);l=(len(q)+1)/2;o,inb=l-d,l-1+d
while s:s=stdin.read(inb);s and map(stdout.write,map(lambda i,b=pow(reduce(
lambda x,y:(x<<8L)+y,map(ord,s)),e,n):chr(b>>8*i&255),range(o-1,-1,-1)))