Mailing List Archive

TCL/Tk
You can always compile it yourself, can't you? Make your own distribution.

"Zigron" <zigron@jps.net> writes:

> I personally don't like that TCL/Tk is now included in the main
> distribution,
> even if Tk is the defacto GUI library for it. And, even if you can't use
> IDLE
> without it.
> But, lots of people do, I'd expect.. so I've a sugguestion :)
>
> Have a seperate distribution that /doesn't/ have TCL/Tk in it? :-)
>
> --Stephen
TCL/Tk [ In reply to ]
TCL/Tk [ In reply to ]
I'm on a Windows machine, and don't have Visual C++, and can't actually
get Borland C++ 5.02 to compile it, there's a couple rather weird errors
that
I can't fix.. most I did, b ut anyways.

So the answer is no :)

--Stephen


Gerald Gutierrez <gutier@intergate.bc.ca> wrote in message
news:m2zp1sdeda.fsf@intergate.bc.ca...
>
> You can always compile it yourself, can't you? Make your own distribution.
>
> "Zigron" <zigron@jps.net> writes:
>
> > I personally don't like that TCL/Tk is now included in the main
> > distribution,
> > even if Tk is the defacto GUI library for it. And, even if you can't use
> > IDLE
> > without it.
> > But, lots of people do, I'd expect.. so I've a sugguestion :)
> >
> > Have a seperate distribution that /doesn't/ have TCL/Tk in it? :-)
> >
> > --Stephen