Mailing List Archive

ifdef 0 bug
av.c: line 85

#ifdef 0

needs to be

#if 0

--tom



Emacs is a fine editor, but I still prefer vi. -me
Re: ifdef 0 bug [ In reply to ]
> #ifdef 0
>
> needs to be
>
> #if 0

In which version? av.c as no #ifdef 0 (or #if 0) in
CPAN/src/5.0/perl5.002beta1g.tar.gz.


Hallvard
Re: ifdef 0 bug [ In reply to ]
>> #ifdef 0
>>
>> needs to be
>>
>> #if 0

>In which version? av.c as no #ifdef 0 (or #if 0) in
>CPAN/src/5.0/perl5.002beta1g.tar.gz.


really? not at line 85?

--tom
Re: ifdef 0 bug [ In reply to ]
>really? not at line 85?

oh, i bet that's from my having applied one of the "interesting"
patches. i didn't send out a patch against them, but they're on
my system. (i tried only to patch against lib, ext, pod, and installman).

--tom
Re: ifdef 0 bug [ In reply to ]
On Thu, 21 Dec 1995 16:15:53 MST, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>>> #ifdef 0
>>>
>>> needs to be
>>>
>>> #if 0
>
>>In which version? av.c as no #ifdef 0 (or #if 0) in
>>CPAN/src/5.0/perl5.002beta1g.tar.gz.
>
>
>really? not at line 85?
>
>--tom
>
It's my fault. It appears Tom has applied one of my patches :-)
This was part of the shared-hash-keys patch I posted.

Dean had kindly pointed this out earlier too.

Sorry.

- Sarathy.
gsar@engin.umich.edu
Re: ifdef 0 bug [ In reply to ]
>On Thu, 21 Dec 1995 16:15:53 MST, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>>>> #ifdef 0
>>>>
>>>> needs to be
>>>>
>>>> #if 0
>>
>>>In which version? av.c as no #ifdef 0 (or #if 0) in
>>>CPAN/src/5.0/perl5.002beta1g.tar.gz.
>>
>>
>>really? not at line 85?
>>
>>--tom
>>
>It's my fault. It appears Tom has applied one of my patches :-)
>This was part of the shared-hash-keys patch I posted.

>Dean had kindly pointed this out earlier too.

>Sorry.

fortunately, it is NOT in patch 1g, just my stuff -- i think.

--tom