Mailing List Archive

5.001n build fails on NeXT 3.2 (black)
Here is the point at which the make died. Note that the configure
was straight default for NeXT.

Making SDBM_File (dynamic)
CCCMD = cc -c -DUSE_NEXT_CTYPE -O
Writing Makefile for SDBM_File::sdbm
CCCMD = cc -c -DUSE_NEXT_CTYPE -O
Writing Makefile for SDBM_File
umask 0 && cp SDBM_File.pm ../../lib/SDBM_File.pm
cd sdbm; make all
cc -c -DUSE_NEXT_CTYPE -O -DVERSION=\"0.10\" -I../../.. -DSDBM -DDUFF
sdbm.c
cc -c -DUSE_NEXT_CTYPE -O -DVERSION=\"0.10\" -I../../.. -DSDBM -DDUFF
pair.c
cc -c -DUSE_NEXT_CTYPE -O -DVERSION=\"0.10\" -I../../.. -DSDBM -DDUFF
hash.c
ar cr libsdbm.a sdbm.o pair.o hash.o
sleep 5; /bin/ranlib libsdbm.a
sh: -cd: not found
*** Exit 1
Stop.
*** Exit 1
Stop.
Re: 5.001n build fails on NeXT 3.2 (black) [ In reply to ]
Dale Amon wrote:
> Here is the point at which the make died. Note that the configure was
> straight default for NeXT.
>

5.002b1 builds fine on NEXTSTEP 3.3 (m68k,i386,sparc).

---
Gerd Knops ------------------------------------------ gerti@BITart.com
Re: 5.001n build fails on NeXT 3.2 (black) [ In reply to ]
On Fri, 24 Nov 1995, Gerd Knops wrote:
> Dale Amon wrote:
> > Here is the point at which the make died. Note that the configure was
> > straight default for NeXT.
> >
>
> 5.002b1 builds fine on NEXTSTEP 3.3 (m68k,i386,sparc).
>

I'm just a bit worried about diving into a Beta on mission critical
software.. I've still got one broken package from the 4 -> 5 upgrade
for which I've no round tuit yet. (BTW the first time I heard that
phrase was about 15 years ago whena friend got a colored round piece
of paper with the word Tuit on it. She got tired of him saying he'd
do things when he got around to it, so she gave him one :-)

But I might try it on a non-critical machine machine to see what it is
like.