Today I got hit by the "DESTROYS wipe out the $@" bug, and spend
innumerable time in debugger trying to understand what happens.
I was absolutely sure this patch made it into 5.001n :-( .
OK, so here is my question: There are plenty of C code patches flying
around that are assigned NET... numbers and have N in "resolved"
slot. Will we do Larry a honor if we consolidate them into
experimental patch level?
If this will simplify Larry's life, then we should simplify Andy's
one: a lot of this patches are obsoleted by some other patches. Why
the venerable authors of patches will not peruse bugs-by-author
database and report patches that are still hot?
Ilya
innumerable time in debugger trying to understand what happens.
I was absolutely sure this patch made it into 5.001n :-( .
OK, so here is my question: There are plenty of C code patches flying
around that are assigned NET... numbers and have N in "resolved"
slot. Will we do Larry a honor if we consolidate them into
experimental patch level?
If this will simplify Larry's life, then we should simplify Andy's
one: a lot of this patches are obsoleted by some other patches. Why
the venerable authors of patches will not peruse bugs-by-author
database and report patches that are still hot?
Ilya