>As I've said elsewhere I believe that SFIO will work 'under the hood' of
>stdio and with a narrow scope (read/write/seek/exceptions).
>I believe both OO (for user level code) and SFIO (for some whizz-bangs)
>are important and complementrary. They can be separate, with no clash.
Hm... if sticking in SFIO is a massive project, isn't htere at
least a free portable stdio implementation bundled in with something
like Cnews (I forget where it was) that we might use?
--tom
>stdio and with a narrow scope (read/write/seek/exceptions).
>I believe both OO (for user level code) and SFIO (for some whizz-bangs)
>are important and complementrary. They can be separate, with no clash.
Hm... if sticking in SFIO is a massive project, isn't htere at
least a free portable stdio implementation bundled in with something
like Cnews (I forget where it was) that we might use?
--tom