Mailing List Archive

rh 6.0 pam patch..
Redhat 6.0 must have changed module names for pam_unix. I believe that this
should provide the desired results. Might want to make a seperate file for
redhat pam..

[root@gordon pam.d]# uname -a
Linux gordon.scully.liquidcool.com 2.2.5-15 #1 Mon Apr 19 21:39:28 EDT 1999
i486
unknown
[root@gordon pam.d]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 6.0 (Hedwig)
[root@gordon pam.d]# diff sshd
/usr/local/src/openssh-1.2pre17/sshd.pam.generic
2c2
< auth required /lib/security/pam_unix_auth.so shadow
---
> auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so shadow
4c4
< account required /lib/security/pam_unix_acct.so
---
> account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
6,7c6,7
< password required /lib/security/pam_unix_password.so shadow nullok
use_a
uthtok
< session required /lib/security/pam_unix_session.so
---
> password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so shadow nullok
use_authtok
> session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
Re: rh 6.0 pam patch.. [ In reply to ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Matt Petteys wrote:

>
> Redhat 6.0 must have changed module names for pam_unix. I believe that this
> should provide the desired results. Might want to make a seperate file for
> redhat pam..

That is why there is a Redhat specific file in packages/redhat/sshd.pam

Damien

- --
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: djm@mindrot.org (home) -or- djm@ibs.com.au (work)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE4WCssormJ9RG1dI8RAn9JAJ9YsD8lLmrKYCdidEhz7Rlj098yrgCcDI+m
pl+AsyCVm8bzbwH2f8lkESk=
=djwU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----