Mailing List Archive: [Bug 688] PAM modules relying on module-private data (pam_dhkeys, pam

[Bug 688] PAM modules relying on module-private data (pam_dhkeys, pam_krb5, AFS) fail

May 28, 2004, 1:31 AM

Post #1 of 3 (134 views)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688

------- Additional Comments From flash@itp.tugraz.at 2004-05-28 19:31 -------
Created an attachment (id=642)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=642&action=view)
Forces Storage of Kerberos Credentials right after authentication via PAM

This is useful for situations where the password is validated through Kerberos
via a PAM module and the credentials obtained during authentication need to be
stored.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 688] PAM modules relying on module-private data (pam_dhkeys, pam_krb5, AFS) fail [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at mindrot

May 28, 2004, 1:40 AM

Post #2 of 3 (131 views)

Permalink

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688

------- Additional Comments From flash@itp.tugraz.at 2004-05-28 19:40 -------
Created an attachment (id=643)
--> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=643&action=view)
Enables storage of forwarded GSSAPI credentials

Storage of forwarded GSSAPI credentials when privilege separation is enabled
fails. The pam_session part is reexecuted after the delegated GSSAPI
credentials are stored.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 688] PAM modules relying on module-private data (pam_dhkeys, pam_krb5, AFS) fail [ In reply to ]

bugzilla-daemon at mindrot

May 28, 2004, 2:24 AM

Post #3 of 3 (131 views)

Permalink

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688

dtucker@zip.com.au changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |874
nThis| |

------- Additional Comments From dtucker@zip.com.au 2004-05-28 20:24 -------
Re-adding PAM+password authentication support is one possible solution to this
(see bug #874).

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.