Mailing List Archive

MX960 differing RE REVs is this ok
Does ISSU require same *Rev* of RE ?



...and is there any reason why I would NOT want to run different Rev of RE
in my MX960 ?



Is it ok to run different rev of RE ? I have REV 17 as RE0 and REV 15 as
RE1. Is this ok?



root> show chassis hardware models | grep Routing

Routing Engine 0 REV 17 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S

Routing Engine 1 REV 15 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S



-Aaron

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Re: MX960 differing RE REVs is this ok [ In reply to ]
Hi Aaron,

I'd say it is not relevant for ISSU. Different hw revisions might have
different chips or capacitors here or there , but functionally they should
be the same.

Regards,
Wojciech

?r., 23 sty 2019, 16:55: Aaron Gould <aaron1@gvtc.com> napisa?(a):

> Does ISSU require same *Rev* of RE ?
>
>
>
> ...and is there any reason why I would NOT want to run different Rev of RE
> in my MX960 ?
>
>
>
> Is it ok to run different rev of RE ? I have REV 17 as RE0 and REV 15 as
> RE1. Is this ok?
>
>
>
> root> show chassis hardware models | grep Routing
>
> Routing Engine 0 REV 17 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S
>
> Routing Engine 1 REV 15 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp