Mailing List Archive

Re: Brocade FCX LACP and Stack
Dear Everyone,

I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across
stack members resulted in the stack only being active/passive... Please
correct me if I'm wrong...

Regards,
Brant.
>
Re: Brocade FCX LACP and Stack [ In reply to ]
Not the stack... I meant the LACP uplink... :P

> Brant Ian Stevens <mailto:branto@argentiumsolutions.com>
> November 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across
> stack members resulted in the stack only being active/passive...
> Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
> Brant Ian Stevens <mailto:branto@argentiumsolutions.com>
> November 13, 2013 at 1:57 PM
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across
> stack members resulted in the stack only being active/passive...
> Please correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
>
Re: Brocade FCX LACP and Stack [ In reply to ]
That should not be the case, you can do either active or passive LACP
across stack members, with both lacp ports up and forwarding/load
balancing. Maybe you were on an older version of code? Even then I do not
recall that being a limitation.

Mike


On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Brant Ian Stevens <
branto@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:

> Not the stack... I meant the LACP uplink... :P
>
> Brant Ian Stevens <branto@argentiumsolutions.com>
> November 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across stack
> members resulted in the stack only being active/passive... Please correct
> me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
> Brant Ian Stevens <branto@argentiumsolutions.com>
> November 13, 2013 at 1:57 PM
> Dear Everyone,
>
> I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across stack
> members resulted in the stack only being active/passive... Please correct
> me if I'm wrong...
>
> Regards,
> Brant.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
>
Re: Brocade FCX LACP and Stack [ In reply to ]
We have 4 x 1GbE LACP trunks working between MLX's and stacks of 2 FCX's. All ports are forwarding...MLX ports are configured for active mode and FCX ports are passive mode.

You can trunk up to 8 x 1GbE in a group across members of the stack however you might like(short of between members of the same stack of course) and all should forward traffic appropriately. 10GbE lags are only supported in two port trunk groups though.

--JK

-----Original Message-----
From: foundry-nsp [mailto:foundry-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brant Ian Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 2:34 PM
To: foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Brocade FCX LACP and Stack

Not the stack... I meant the LACP uplink... :P




Brant Ian Stevens <mailto:branto@argentiumsolutions.com>
November 13, 2013 at 2:21 PM
Dear Everyone,

I seem to remember that configuring an LACP trunk on the FCX across stack members resulted in the stack only being active/passive... Please correct me if I'm wrong...

Regards,
Brant.



_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp