FlashPool SSDs (unlike FlashCache) are attached to aggregates as normal RAID groups, so you can use as many 3.8 TB drives in RAID-DP as you like to hit the maximum FlashPool capacity.
Note that FlashPool and FabricPool use the same underlying tiering metadata structures, so you can only have one or the other enabled on any given aggregate.
Thanks,
Michael
?On 10/16/23, 8:03 AM, "Toasters on behalf of Florian Schmid via Toasters" <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net <mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> on behalf of toasters@teaparty.net <mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> wrote:
Hi Alexander,
this is a very good tip! Tank you very much.
I will have a look on this.
Best regards,
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Alexander Griesser" <AGriesser@anexia.com>
An: "Florian Schmid" <fschmid@ubimet.com>, "toasters" <toasters@teaparty.net>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Oktober 2023 12:07:53
Betreff: AW: Question about flash pool maximum SSD size and local tiering
Hi Florian,
I cannot answer the question with the SSD sizes, I'm not sure if this is really a hard requirement or if the slices just may not be bigger than 3.8TB (in that case, you could probably manually partition the SSDs), maybe someone else has more insights into this.
As for your second question: You can spin up OnTap's integrated S3 server on your old boxes and use them as fabric pool targets:
https://www.netapp.com/media/17219-tr4814.pdf
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia.com
Web: https://www.anexia.com
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Florian Schmid <fschmid@ubimet.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Oktober 2023 11:53
An: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Question about flash pool maximum SSD size and local tiering
Hi,
I have checked NetApp HWU for a FAS 8300 and system cache limits.
Ok, so far, max flash-pool is 72 TB, which is a way more than I want to use, but I haven't seen usable SSDs greater than 3.8 TB.
Is that really true, that I can't use a 7.6 TB or 15.3 TB SSD for flash-pool?
It would be nice, if someone has here a deeper understanding than I have about this and can give me here some clarifications.
May I ask a second question?
Is flash-pool still the way to go for speeding up NL-SAS aggregates?
I had a look on fabric-pool tiering, but it seems like, that this only works to S3 storage, which we don't have.
We have plenty of NL-SAS storage and also of SSDs and it would be great to have a tiering between them or at least use them for caching.
Best regards,
Florian
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
Note that FlashPool and FabricPool use the same underlying tiering metadata structures, so you can only have one or the other enabled on any given aggregate.
Thanks,
Michael
?On 10/16/23, 8:03 AM, "Toasters on behalf of Florian Schmid via Toasters" <toasters-bounces@teaparty.net <mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net> on behalf of toasters@teaparty.net <mailto:toasters@teaparty.net>> wrote:
Hi Alexander,
this is a very good tip! Tank you very much.
I will have a look on this.
Best regards,
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Alexander Griesser" <AGriesser@anexia.com>
An: "Florian Schmid" <fschmid@ubimet.com>, "toasters" <toasters@teaparty.net>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Oktober 2023 12:07:53
Betreff: AW: Question about flash pool maximum SSD size and local tiering
Hi Florian,
I cannot answer the question with the SSD sizes, I'm not sure if this is really a hard requirement or if the slices just may not be bigger than 3.8TB (in that case, you could probably manually partition the SSDs), maybe someone else has more insights into this.
As for your second question: You can spin up OnTap's integrated S3 server on your old boxes and use them as fabric pool targets:
https://www.netapp.com/media/17219-tr4814.pdf
Best,
Alexander Griesser
Head of Systems Operations
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
E-Mail: AGriesser@anexia.com
Web: https://www.anexia.com
Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Florian Schmid <fschmid@ubimet.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Oktober 2023 11:53
An: toasters@teaparty.net
Betreff: Question about flash pool maximum SSD size and local tiering
Hi,
I have checked NetApp HWU for a FAS 8300 and system cache limits.
Ok, so far, max flash-pool is 72 TB, which is a way more than I want to use, but I haven't seen usable SSDs greater than 3.8 TB.
Is that really true, that I can't use a 7.6 TB or 15.3 TB SSD for flash-pool?
It would be nice, if someone has here a deeper understanding than I have about this and can give me here some clarifications.
May I ask a second question?
Is flash-pool still the way to go for speeding up NL-SAS aggregates?
I had a look on fabric-pool tiering, but it seems like, that this only works to S3 storage, which we don't have.
We have plenty of NL-SAS storage and also of SSDs and it would be great to have a tiering between them or at least use them for caching.
Best regards,
Florian
_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
Toasters@teaparty.net
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters