Mailing List Archive: Not entirely OT

Not entirely OT

Feb 18, 2003, 8:33 AM

Post #1 of 3 (604 views)

A link to this came up on freshmeat:

http://www.plausible.org/nasl/

Obviously the only appropriate action is to sue the bejeesus out of them in
as many court systems as possible and make them pay millions in restitution
for confusing the brand identity of NASL :)

Re: Not entirely OT [ In reply to ]

earnoth at comcast

Feb 18, 2003, 9:17 AM

Post #2 of 3 (585 views)

Permalink

Almost as bad (perhaps worse?) is Foundstone calling their Vulnerability
Assessment tool's scripting language FASL...

On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:33, Minderhout, Doug wrote:
> A link to this came up on freshmeat:
>
> http://www.plausible.org/nasl/
>
> Obviously the only appropriate action is to sue the bejeesus out of them in
> as many court systems as possible and make them pay millions in restitution
> for confusing the brand identity of NASL :)

--
Eric I. Arnoth CISSP (http://www.isc2.org)
earnoth@comcast.net
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/earnoth
¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°*°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°*°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°*°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°*°º¤ø,¸¸,ø

Re: Not entirely OT [ In reply to ]

deraison at nessus

Feb 18, 2003, 11:37 AM

Post #3 of 3 (583 views)

Permalink

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:33:14AM -0500, Minderhout, Doug wrote:
> A link to this came up on freshmeat:
>
> http://www.plausible.org/nasl/
>
> Obviously the only appropriate action is to sue the bejeesus out of them in
> as many court systems as possible and make them pay millions in restitution
> for confusing the brand identity of NASL :)

I sent an email to the author, I hope he'll change the name.

-- Renaud