Mailing List Archive

The NANOG Meeting will be Monday, 9/11 9:00AM - 5:00PM and Tuesday, 9/12
9:00AM -12:00PM with a continental breakfast each morning at 8:30AM. This
meeting will be held in Philadelphia, PA.

Umm, last I checked, the NANOG meeting was supposed to be at the Pittsburgh
Supercomputing Center, which I believe is about a six to eight hour drive from
Philadelphia. I assume the above is a typeo...

--Vince

>I think this is supposed to say Pittsburgh, PA.

Ah, no, this is just the ultimate in address portability.

Sean.

On Thu, 17 Aug 1995, Sean Doran wrote:

> >I think this is supposed to say Pittsburgh, PA.
>
> Ah, no, this is just the ultimate in address portability.
>
> Sean.

hmmm, it looks like we're using some form of aggregation for this... ;-)

P*/19 PA Nanog0

Barry

---
Sig files are so annoying. I never use 'em. You see, it's hard to
determine what the best thing is to go in that, oh, four lines or so at
the bottom, and you know you want to make it something meaningful, at
least to you. So, I just don't use 'em.

hmmmmmm, are we talking about southern new york here??? :-)

>Sean Doran writes:
>
> >I think this is supposed to say Pittsburgh, PA.
>
> Ah, no, this is just the ultimate in address portability.
>
> Sean.
>

Hi,

I will be attending the NANOG meeting in Pittsburg.

Walt Prue
Los Nettos
USC/ISI

Yes, I do want to get a room. Kathy, can you reserve a room for me the same
nights Randy Bush is there? Thank you.

we will need to make reservations for all Whitney, Chris and John. I think
Andrew and Randy are already set. We are going to have a staff meeting
pre-NANOG. des

----------
From: Pam Ciesla
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 1996 8:58 AM
To: nanog@home.merit.edu
Subject: NANOG Meeting


NOTE: Hotel rooms are in high demand. If you are planning on attending
this meeting please reserve your hotel ASAP. I have had hotels calling
requesting that room blocks be released because they a waiting list for
rooms on the meeting dates.
Pam Ciesla
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

> haven't you realized yet that you are a pawn of the military
> industrial complex conspiracy to deny the presence of aliens from outer
> space here to harvest humans for food by restricting control of root
> nameservers?

You forgot the reverse vampires, who are in league with the space
aliens as part of the massive government conspiracy. They're simply
trying to eliminate "dinner." No-one's being harvested; that theory
turned out to be a misinterpretation of a dusty cook-book cover.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

>> haven't you realized yet that you are a pawn of the military
>> industrial complex conspiracy to deny the presence of aliens from outer
>> space here to harvest humans for food by restricting control of root
>> nameservers?
>
>You forgot the reverse vampires, who are in league with the space
>aliens as part of the massive government conspiracy. They're simply
>trying to eliminate "dinner." No-one's being harvested; that theory
>turned out to be a misinterpretation of a dusty cook-book cover.
>

Excuse me. They prefer to be called "saucer people". I suspect you'll
be hearing from the lawyers of the Saucer People Anti-Defamation League
momentarily (as soon as they figure out how to turn off recursion on
their Linux box so they can rejoin the Andromeda Galaxy root nameserver
confederation).

Regards,
-drc

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

And don't forget the black helicopters. They followed the
Flem-Man over from the NAIPR list.

*sigh*

- paul

At 09:05 PM 05/29/97 -0700, Stephen Stuart wrote:

>> haven't you realized yet that you are a pawn of the military
>> industrial complex conspiracy to deny the presence of aliens from outer
>> space here to harvest humans for food by restricting control of root
>> nameservers?
>
>You forgot the reverse vampires, who are in league with the space
>aliens as part of the massive government conspiracy. They're simply
>trying to eliminate "dinner." No-one's being harvested; that theory
>turned out to be a misinterpretation of a dusty cook-book cover.
>
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On Thursday, May 29, 1997 8:48 PM, Philip J. Nesser II[SMTP:pjnesser@martigny.ai.mit.edu] wrote:
@ Jim Fleming supposedly said:
@ >
@ > Will the Root Name Server Confederations be
@ > discussed at the upcoming NANOG meeting
@ > where Michael Dillon is giving an ISP tutorial ?
@ >
@ > @@@@ http://www.nanog.org/mtg-9706/tutorial.html
@
@
@ In a word: no
@
@ (Of course there are many good laughs had by all when someone comes up with
@ the latest joke)
@
@ ----> Phil
@

Since NANOG is promoting the education, hopefully
people will be informed that Mr. Michael Dillon has strong
views on some of the various leading edge movements on
the Internet. He has also been one of the major advocates
for the IAHC. The IAHC has not followed through with
registries as promised and now we have brokers out there
pre-registering people in Top Level Domains that do not
exist and do not have TLD Name Servers. Mr. Michael
Dillon has supported the actions of these brokers and
claims they are providing a useful service.

Does NANOG support that kind of activity ?


=============================================================

Re: IANA/ISI/USC/UCLA (Was: Address Space)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

.To: inet-access@earth.com
.Subject: Re: IANA/ISI/USC/UCLA (Was: Address Space)
.From: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>
.Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 17:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
.In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970429170232.006af84c@jcnis.com>
.List-Admin: inet-access-request@earth.com (subscribe/unsubscribe requests) .Organization: Memra Software Inc. - Internet consulting

------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Patrick Gilmore wrote:

> Sorry if I took it too far.

I was mostly concerned about your description of IANA because there are a
number of people and organizations who are spreading misinformation and
pure FUD about IANA in and attempt to get the U.S. government to usurp
IANA's authority and enforce a restricted monopoly system of domain names.

I personally am opposed to both the Internic/NSI schemes
http://www.netsol.com/papers/internet.html
and the eDNS schemes http://www.edns.net and the name.space schemes
http://www.pgpmedia.com/ns./com/reg_noframe.html

One strategy that these people are using is to claim that IANA does not
really exist or to claim that IANA has no authority to do what it has done
for many years or that someone else (DOD, USC, FNC, ...) really is in
charge of the IANA.

I know it can be hard to figure out what's really going on with so much
FUD being distributed so I don't blame you for misunderstanding the
relationships between USC and IANA.

Michael Dillon - Internet & ISP Consulting
Memra Software Inc. - Fax: +1-250-546-3049
http://www.memra.com - E-mail: michael@memra.com

====================================================

--
Jim Fleming
Unir Corporation
http://www.Unir.Corp



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[Root nameservers stuff]

Michael Dillon wrote:

>
> But Mark Kosters did note that J has been deployed to LINX in London and
> some other folks were talking about deployment plans for other roots to
> South Africa, Japan and Australia in the hallways.

K, not J, btw.


Regards,
Andrew
--
Andrew Bangs, Senior Systems Administrator, Demon Internet Ltd
andrewb@demon.net http://www.demon.net/ http://www.demon.nl/

Hi,

>But Mark Kosters did note that J has been deployed to LINX in London

The IANA has indicated J should be delegated to WIDE in Japan last
week (202.12.27.33), however I note that the delegation has not yet
been done...

% dig @a.root-servers.net
...
;; ADDITIONAL RECORDS:
J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 A 198.41.0.10
...

Regards,
-drc

On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, David R. Conrad wrote:

> >But Mark Kosters did note that J has been deployed to LINX in London
>
> The IANA has indicated J should be delegated to WIDE in Japan last
> week (202.12.27.33), however I note that the delegation has not yet
> been done...

Oh well.... I got the letter names mixed up but the principle remains.
There are purely root nameservers out there, one is in London and
deployment for two others in Asia/Pacific is imminent.

*********************************************************
Michael Dillon voice: +1-415-482-2840
Senior Systems Architect fax: +1-415-482-2844
PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net

"The People You Know. The People You Trust."
*********************************************************