Hi, Nick:
1) " ... So that suggests that 240/4 would provide a little more than
1Y of consumption, ... ":
EzIP proposes to use 240/4 CG-NAT's 100.64/10. So, 240/4 will be
reusable worldwide and no need to consider consumption rate.
Regards,
Abe (2024-01-11 23:06)
On 2024-01-11 07:43, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Christopher Hawker wrote on 11/01/2024 10:54:
>> Reclassifying this space, would add 10+ years onto the free pool for
>> each RIR
>
> on this point: prior to RIR depletion, the annual global run-rate on
> /8s measured by IANA was ~13 per annum. So that suggests that 240/4
> would provide a little more than 1Y of consumption, assuming no demand
> back-pressure, which seems an unlikely assumption.
>
> Nick
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
1) " ... So that suggests that 240/4 would provide a little more than
1Y of consumption, ... ":
EzIP proposes to use 240/4 CG-NAT's 100.64/10. So, 240/4 will be
reusable worldwide and no need to consider consumption rate.
Regards,
Abe (2024-01-11 23:06)
On 2024-01-11 07:43, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Christopher Hawker wrote on 11/01/2024 10:54:
>> Reclassifying this space, would add 10+ years onto the free pool for
>> each RIR
>
> on this point: prior to RIR depletion, the annual global run-rate on
> /8s measured by IANA was ~13 per annum. So that suggests that 240/4
> would provide a little more than 1Y of consumption, assuming no demand
> back-pressure, which seems an unlikely assumption.
>
> Nick
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com